SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matocha, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kukkadapu, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Matocha, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kukkadapu, R. K.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Matocha, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kukkadapu, R. K.

Kinetics and Mechanism of Birnessite Reduction by Catechol

Christopher J. Matochaa, Donald L. Sparksb, James E. Amonettec and Ravi K. Kukkadapuc

a Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Kentucky, N-122 Ag. Sci. Ctr-North, Lexington, KY 40546-0091
b Dep. of Plant and Soil Sciences, 147 Townsend Hall, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 19717-1303
c William R.Wiley Environmental Molecular Sciences Lab. (EMSL), Pacific Northwest National Lab., Richland, WA 99352



View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (A) Representative room temperature EPR spectra of 100 µM MnT as birnessite (0.45 m2 L-1) reacted with catechol (5 x 10-3 M) depicting the characteristic six-line spectra of the Mn(II) product. H0 and H1 indicate the peak and valley used to quantify Mn(II) concentrations. (B) Intercalibration standard curve relating EPR signal intensity at the 0.3435 T (H0) peak to flame AAS Mn(II) concentration

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Typical stoichiometry of H+ consumed versus dissolved Mn(II) produced during birnessite reduction by catechol

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Representative EPR-SF kinetics of reductive dissolution of birnessite by catechol at pH 4 as a function of [CAT] conducted at 23°C and 0.45 m2 L-1 [SA]

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Initial rate of dissolved Mn(II) release measured by the EPR-SF technique as a function of: (A) [CAT] at pH 4 and 0.90 m2 L-1 [SA]; (B) [SA] at pH 4 and 5 (10-3 M [CAT]; and (C) [H+] at 0.90 m2 L-1 [SA]. The dotted lines represent the 95% confidence interval bands

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Kinetics of catechol oxidation to o-quinone by birnessite and dissolved Mn(II) release at 23°C. Experimental conditions were: , , pH 4,

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Activation parameters derived from (A) Arrhenius and (B) Eyring plots describing the reductive dissolution of birnessite by catechol

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Soil Science Society of America.