HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Trostle, C. L. Articles by Allan, D.L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Trostle, C. L. Articles by Allan, D.L. Agricola Articles by Trostle, C. L. Articles by Allan, D.L. Related Collections Rice Nutrient Management Plant Nutrition

HEDTA–Nitrilotriacetic Acid Chelator-Buffered Nutrient Solution for Zinc Deficiency Evaluation in Rice

^a Texas A&M Univ. Research & Extension Center, Route 3, Box 213AA, Lubbock, TX 79403
^b Dep. of Soil, Water, & Climate, Univ. of Minnesota, 439 Borlaug Hall, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108-6028

View larger version (25K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Calculated change in (Fe3+) and (Zn2+) vs. pH in a basal nutrient solution (pH 5.5) chelated with HEDTA and NTA with 200.0 µM total chelated Fe(III), 2.00 µM total chelated Zn, and 3.0 mM MES as calculated with GEOCHEM-PC

View larger version (25K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Response of IR-36 plant, shoot, and root dry mass vs. (Zn2+) at 21 d after transplanting in an HEDTA-NTA chelator-buffered system at pH 5.5. Mean ± 1 SD at each point represents eight values (duplicate trials, four plants per tub). Significance was determined at = 0.05

View larger version (39K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Affected rice leaves per tub (four plants) vs. (Zn2+) at 21 d after transplanting in an HEDTA-NTA chelator-buffered system at pH 5.5. Each value is the mean of two trials. Mean tiller number represents eight plants and indicates higher number of leaves for high (Zn2+)