SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Celi, L.
Right arrow Articles by Barberis, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Celi, L.
Right arrow Articles by Barberis, E.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Celi, L.
Right arrow Articles by Barberis, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Structure and Properties
Right arrow Soil Analysis
Right arrow Soil Chemistry

Effects of pH and Electrolytes on Inositol Hexaphosphate Interaction with Goethite

L. Celi, M. Presta, F. Ajmore-Marsan and E. Barberis

Università di Torino, DIVAPRA-Chimica Agraria via Leonardo da Vinci 44, Grugliasco 10095 (TO) Italy



View larger version (146K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Transmission electronic micrograph of goethite

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Variation of (a) zeta potential ({zeta}) and (b) apparent particle size (dz) of goethite with pH in 0.01 M KCl and 0.0033 M CaCl2

 


View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of the pH on sorption of inositol hexaphosphate (IHP) and inorganic phosphate (Pi) by goethite in 0.01 M KCl: Variation of (a) the sorbed amount (Qa), (b) zeta potential ({zeta}), and (c) apparent particle size (dz) with the pH

 


View larger version (8K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effect of the pH on sorption of inositol hexaphosphate (IHP) and inorganic phosphate (Pi) by goethite in 0.0033 M CaCl2: variation of (a) the sorbed amount (Qa), (b) zeta potential ({zeta}), and (c) apparent particle size (dz) with the pH

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Aqueous speciation of inositol hexaphosphate (IHP) and inorganic phosphate (H2PO-4) at increasing pH

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Mechanism of adsorption of myo-inositol hexaphosphate on the goethite surface at pH 4.5. For the sake of simplicity, the H and OH of the phosphate groups were omitted (by Ognalaga et al., 1994)

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Precipitate formation of Ca3-IHP and CaHPO4 at increasing pH. On the y axis the activity of IHP6- or H2PO-4 is reported

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Soil Science Society of America.