Calibration of a Two-Dimensional Root Water Uptake Model
J. A. Vrugta,
J. W. Hopmans*,b and
J.
imunekc
a Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Nieuwe Prinsengracht 130, Amsterdam, 1018 VZ
b Hydrology Program, Dept. Land, Air and Water Resources (LAWR), University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
c USDA Salinity Laboratory, University of California, Riverside, CA 95207, USA

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Representation of different root water uptake models, Sm(z), with depth.
|
|

View larger version (58K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Four different configurations of two-dimensional spatial distribution of potential root water uptake, ß(r,z).
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Soil surface boundary conditions during simulation period (Time 0 corresponds with 13 September).
|
|

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. Optimized spatial distribution of potential transpiration ß(r,z).
|
|

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7. Measured (open circles) and simulated (solid lines) water content values as a function of time across the measured spatial domain of the almond tree (C denotes calibration and V is validation).
|
|

View larger version (53K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8. Two-dimensional maps of simulated water content values (m3 m-3) and root water uptake (d-1) at three different times during the experimental period.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9. (a) Components of the water balance, (b) Measured versus simulated soil water storage during the monitoring period.
|
|
Copyright © 2001 by the Soil Science Society of America.