SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jaynes, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Kanwar, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jaynes, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Kanwar, R. S.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jaynes, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Kanwar, R. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Fate
Right arrow Soil Physics
Right arrow Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport

Temporal Dynamics of Preferential Flow to a Subsurface Drain

D. B. Jaynes*,a, S. I. Ahmedb, K.-J. S. Kungc and R. S. Kanwarb

a USDA-ARS-National Soil Tilth Lab., 2150 Pammel Dr., Ames, IA 50011-3120
b Agricultural & Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
c Dep. Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706



View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of irrigation plot showing location of subsurface drain pipe, tracer strip, irrigation grid, sump, and deep soil cores.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Hourly and cumulative irrigation [day of year, (DOY 182)] and precipitation (DOY > 182) from the start of irrigation on DOY 181.5.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Timing of irrigation and rain, tile flow rate, and conservative tracer concentrations in tile effluent versus day of year (DOY) for entire monitoring period. Also shown are simulated Br concentrations.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Timing of conservative tracer application (arrows), tile flow rate, and conservative tracer concentrations in tile effluent versus time from start of irrigation. Only first 10 h of irrigation are shown.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Timing of irrigation and rain, tile flow rate, and herbicide concentrations in tile effluent versus day of year (DOY) for entire monitoring period.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Tile flow rate and herbicide concentrations in tile effluent versus time since start of irrigation. Only first 10 h of irrigation are shown.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Average relative mass recovered and standard error of mean (SE) of conservative tracers and simulated Br mass in soil profile 20 d after application.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Average relative mass and standard error of mean (SE) of recovered herbicides in soil profile 20 d after application.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the Soil Science Society of America.