SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ding, G.
Right arrow Articles by Xing, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ding, G.
Right arrow Articles by Xing, B.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ding, G.
Right arrow Articles by Xing, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Humic Substances
Right arrow Soil Conservation
Right arrow Other Soil Management

Soil Organic Matter Characteristics as Affected by Tillage Management

G. Dinga, J. M. Novakb, D. Amarasiriwardenac, P. G. Huntb and B. Xing*,a

a Dep. of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003
b USDA-ARS-Coastal Plains Soil, Water, and Plant Research Center, Florence, SC 29501
c School of Natural Science, Hampshire College, Amherst, MA 01002



View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Cross-polarization magic angle-spinning total sideband suppression 13C NMR spectra of humic acids in a Norfolk soil under different tillages: (1A) conservation tillage treatment (CnT1, 0–5 cm; CnT2, 5–10 cm; and CnT3, 10–15 cm); (1B) conventional tillage treatment (CT1, 0–5 cm; CT2, 5–10 cm; and CT3, 10–15 cm).

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Solid-state 13C NMR data under different tillage systems: (A) aliphatic-C (0–108 ppm); (B) carbohydrate-C (60–96 ppm); (C) aromatic-C (108–162 ppm); and (D) aromaticity (108–145 ppm)/(0–162 ppm).

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Diffuse reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectra of humic acids in a Norfolk soil under different tillage treatments: (3A) conservation tillage treatment (CnT1, 0–5 cm; CnT2, 5–10 cm; and CnT3, 10–15 cm); (3B) conventional tillage treatment (CT1, 0–5 cm; CT2, 5–10 cm; and CT3, 10–15 cm).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the Soil Science Society of America.