HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Logsdon, S. D. Articles by Moorman, T. B. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Logsdon, S. D. Articles by Moorman, T. B. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Logsdon, S. D. Articles by Moorman, T. B. Related Collections Preferential Flow Soil Models Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport

Measured and Predicted Solute Leaching from Multiple Undisturbed Soil Columns

^a NSTL, 2150 Pammel Dr., Ames, IA 50011-3120
^b BASF, Ag. Prod. Center, 26 Davis Dr., P.O. Box 13528, Res. Triangle Park, NC 27709-3528

View larger version (77K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Diagram of column showing the horizontal measurement planes for hydraulic conductivity as a function of head, K(h). Each measurement plane was the top depth for an undisturbed sample taken for bulk density and Ks (saturated). The model was run with eight depths, two for each of the measured sections. Loose soil was taken for particle-size analysis.

View larger version (27K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Predicted drainage vs. measured drainage for the twelve treatment combinations. Each predicted point was the mean of three replicates, and each measured point was the mean of four replicates.

View larger version (30K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Predicted tritium leached vs measured tritium leached for the twelve treatment combinations. Each predicted point was the mean of three replicates, and each measured point was the mean of four replicates.

View larger version (29K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Predicted Br leached vs. measured bromide leached for the twelve treatment combinations. Each predicted point was the mean of three replicates, and each measured point was the mean of four replicates.

View larger version (55K): [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Measured Br concentration as a function of outflow volume for each soil–tillage–intensity combination.

View larger version (51K): [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Measured tritium reduced concentration as a function of outflow volume for each soil–tillage–intensity combination.

View larger version (34K): [in a new window]   Fig. 7. Mean predicted Br concentration at specified volume outflows for the high and low first rain intensity treatments and RMSE for each soil–tillage combination. Outflow for each rain event was about 20%.

View larger version (33K): [in a new window]   Fig. 8. Mean predicted Br concentration at specified volume outflows for the high and low first rain intensity treatments and RMSE for each soil–tillage combination. Outflow for each rain event was about 20%.