SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leij, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Or, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leij, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Or, D.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Leij, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Or, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Structure and Properties
Right arrow Soil Physics
Right arrow Tillage

Analytical Models for Soil Pore-Size Distribution After Tillage

Feike J. Leij*,a, Teamrat A. Ghezzeheib and Dani Orb

a USDA-ARS, George E. Brown Jr. Salinity Lab. and Dep. of Environmental Sciences, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92507-4851
b Dep. of Plants, Soils, and Biometeorology, Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322



View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Evolution of pore-size distribution over time according to Eq. [13] with no decay, a time-dependent drift term V(t) given by Eq. [14] with a = 0.01 d-1, b = 5 µm, <r0> = 7.5 µm (shown in insert), and a constant dispersivity: (a) {lambda} = 1 µm and (b) {lambda} = 0.1 µm. The initial distribution is according to Eq. [5] with {theta}s = 0.469, {theta}r = 0.191, {sigma} = 0.253, and r0 = 7.3 µm.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Evolution of pore-size distribution over time according to Eq. [24] with no decay, a drift term v(r,t) = u(r)w(t) where w(t) is given by Eq. [14], with a = 0.01 d-1, b = 5 µm, <r0> = 7.5 µm (upper insert), and u(r) is given by Eq. [16] with uo = 0.5 (lower insert), and a dispersion term D(r,t) = -{lambda}(r)v(r,t) where {lambda}(r) is given by Eq. [16] with: (a) {lambda}o = 0.25 and (b) {lambda}o = 0.05. The initial distribution is again given by Eq. [5] with {theta}s = 0.469, {theta}r = 0.191, {sigma} = 0.253, and r0 = 7.3 µm.

 


View larger version (61K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Unit cell with cubic packing of spherical aggregates: (a) initial packing with strain {epsilon} = h/a = 0 and (b) packing with {epsilon} = 0.05. Illustration of coalescence at the contact area of two aggregates because of viscous and capillary forces: (c) definition sketch of aggregates with radius, a, and reduction in distance between aggregate centers, 2h.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Evolution of the interaggregate pore-size distribution of a Millville silt loam according to Eq. [13] with drift and degradation terms given by Eq. [30] and [31], {delta} = 0.1, {lambda} = 0.5 µm and initial distribution with r0 = 48.45 µm and porosity ({theta}s - {theta}r) equal to 0.2 as well as {sigma} = 0.2.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Temporal behavior of parameters for the interaggregate pore-size distribution of a Millville silt loam shown in Fig. 4: (a) strain ({epsilon}), matric potential ({psi}), and lower and upper limits on {psi}, (b) drift term (V) and degradation term (M) and (c) first-order normalized (M1) and second-order central (µ2) moments.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Evolution of the interaggregate pore-size distribution of a Millville silt loam according to to Eq. [24] with time-dependent drift and degradation terms given by Eq. [30] and [31], {delta} = 0.1, uo = 0.1, {lambda}o = 0.05 and initial distribution with <r0> = 48.45 µm and porosity ({theta}s - {theta}r) = 0.2 as well as {sigma} = 0.2.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Temporal behavior of the first-order normalized (M1) and second-order central (µ2) moments for the interaggregate pore-size distribution of a Millville silt loam shown in Fig. 5.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Parameters inferred from the settlement of a Millville silt loam during wetting (0–30 and 60–90 min) and drying (30–60 and 90–120 min) cycles: (a) observed and optimized axial strain and (b) drift coefficient according to the coalescence model.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Pore-size distribution and retention curves for the Millville silt loam: (a) initial PSD determined from soil water characteristics (SWC) and pore-size distributions (PSDs) predicted at the end of two drying cycles using the coalescence model, and (b) corresponding SWCs and experimental retention data.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the Soil Science Society of America.