SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cook, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Knight, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cook, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Knight, J. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cook, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Knight, J. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Physics
Right arrow Soil Models
Right arrow Plant and Soil Interactions

Oxygen Transport to Plant Roots

Modeling for Physical Understanding of Soil Aeration

F. J. Cook*,a and J. H. Knightb

a CSIRO, Land and Water, 120 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly QLD 4068, Australia and CRC for Sustainable Sugar Production
b CSIRO, Land and Water, P.O. Box 1666, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of a root surrounded by an actual and hypothetical liquid-filled boundary layer, the radii a and R is also shown.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Concentration of O2 in soil air (C) as related to depth in the soil, for different temperatures for a soil with {theta} = 0.13 m3 m-3. The other variables are as listed in Tables 1 and 2 and shown in Fig. 3.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Microbial (Mo) and root (Pz (z = 0) respiration terms as a function of temperature.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Sensitivity of {theta}m to C* for four different temperatures.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Sensitivity of {theta}m to Cr for four different temperatures.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Sensitivity of {theta}m to (a) Mo, (b) Lo and (c) Zm = Zr for four different temperatures.

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Sensitivity of {theta}m to qo (the total respiration at z = 0) at a temperature of 293 K.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Sensitivity of {theta}m to R/a for four different temperatures.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Sensitivity of {theta}m to f for four different temperatures.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. The time to deplete the oxygen dissolved in the water phase, as related to the water content of the soil (f- {theta}a) at four different temperatures. This analysis assumes no replenishment of the oxygen in the water phase during this depletion and that the root respiration was calculated with C = 0.05 kg m-3.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the Soil Science Society of America.