SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mikha, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rice, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mikha, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rice, C. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mikha, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rice, C. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Carbon Sequestration
Right arrow Soil Organic Matter

Tillage and Manure Effects on Soil and Aggregate-Associated Carbon and Nitrogen

Maysoon M. Mikha and Charles W. Rice*

Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506



View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Total C and N (g kg–1; normalized to sand-free basis) in water-stable aggregates (n = 4). A and C represent aggregate total C and N for no-tillage (NT) and conventional tillage (CT) averaged across manure (M) and fertilizer (F), lowercase letters indicate significant differences between aggregate-size fraction and tillage; P < 0.05; B and D represent aggregate total C and N for manure and fertilizer averaged across tillage, lowercase letters indicate significant differences between aggregate-size fraction and N source; P < 0.05.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Labile C and N after 28 d of incubation (µg g–1; normalized to sand-free basis) in water-stable aggregates (n = 4). A and C represent aggregate labile C and N for no-tillage (NT) and conventional tillage (CT) and averaged across manure (M) and fertilizer (F), lowercase letters indicate significant differences between aggregate-size fraction and tillage; P < 0.05; B and D represent aggregate labile C and N for manure and fertilizer averaged across tillage, lowercase letters indicate significant differences between aggregate-size fraction and N source; P < 0.05.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Total C and N masses (g whole aggregate–1; normalized to sand-free basis) in water-stable aggregates (n = 4). (A and C) represent aggregate total C and N for no-tillage (NT) and conventional tillage (CT) averaged across manure (M) and fertilizer (F), lowercase letters indicate significant differences between aggregate size fraction and tillage; P < 0.05; B and D represent aggregate total C and N for manure and fertilizer averaged across tillage, lowercase letters indicate significant differences between aggregate-size fraction and N source; P < 0.05.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Labile C and N mass after 28 d of incubation (µg whole aggregate–1; normalized to sand-free basis) in water-stable aggregates (n = 4). A and C represent aggregate labile C and N for no-tillage (NT) and conventional tillage (CT) averaged across manure (M) and fertilizer (F), lowercase letters indicate significant differences between aggregate size fraction and tillage; P < 0.05; B and D represent aggregate labile C and N for manure and fertilizer averaged across tillage, lowercase letters indicate significant differences between aggregate size fraction and N source; P < 0.05.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.