SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Thiet, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Thiet, R. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Thiet, R. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Carbon Sequestration
Right arrow Microbial Processes
Right arrow Soil Organic Matter

Preferential Accumulation of Microbial Carbon in Aggregate Structures of No-Tillage Soils

Rodney T. Simpsona, Serita D. Freya,*, Johan Sixb and Rachel K. Thieta

a Dep. of Natural Resources, Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824
b Dep. of Agronomy and Range Science, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616



View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Aggregate separation scheme. Fractionation I involved wet sieving air-dry soil into four aggregate-size classes. In fractionation II, small macroaggregates (250–2000 µm) were further separated into coarse sand and POM (>250 µm), microaggregates (53–250 µm) and the silt and clay fraction (<53 µm).

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Total amino sugar C (g m–2) at 0 to 5 and 5 to 20 cm in conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) soils at Horseshoe Bend, GA. There was a significant difference (P < 0.05) between NT and CT at the 0- to 5-cm depth for all three amino sugars. Inset: Total amino sugar C in the plow layer (0–20 cm).

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Contribution of aggregate-size classes to whole soil amino sugar C (mg kg–1 whole soil) in surface soil (0–5 cm) of (A) conventional tillage (CT) and (B) no-tillage (NT) soils at Horseshoe Bend, GA. Bars with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) across aggregate size classes for a given amino sugar. An * indicates a significant difference between CT and NT within an aggregate size class and amino sugar.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Amino sugar C in macroaggregate-derived size classes on a whole soil basis for (A) conventional tillage (CT) and (B) no-tillage (NT) soils at Horseshoe Bend, GA (0–5 cm depth). Bars with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) across aggregate size classes for a given amino sugar. An * indicates a significant difference between CT and NT within an aggregate size class and amino sugar.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.