SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Weil, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williams, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Weil, R. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Williams, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Weil, R. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sustainable Agriculture
Right arrow Water Stress
Right arrow Soil Compaction

Crop Cover Root Channels May Alleviate Soil Compaction Effects on Soybean Crop

Stacey M. Williamsa,b,* and Ray R. Weila

a Dep. of Natural Resource Sciences and Landscape Architecture, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
b Dep. of Horticulture, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853



View larger version (43K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Penetration resistance (kPa) with depth (cm) at Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC) and Wye Research and Education Center (WREC). Average volumetric water content at time of penetration resistance measurement was 0.22 cm3 cm–3 (WREC) and 0.27 cm3 cm–3 (BARC) in the surface soil (0–20 cm) and 0.29 cm3 cm–3 (WREC) and 0.39 cm3 cm–3 (BARC) in the subsoil (20–40 cm).

 


View larger version (135K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Minirhizotron images showing canola roots growing in May (left) and soybean roots observed in July and August (right) following the channels made by the preceding canola cover crop at 38.2 cm (at WREC) (top) and 18 cm (at BARC) (bottom) depth. Bulk density was 1.55 and 1.61 and penetration resistance was 2247 and 2176 kPa for the upper and lower soils, respectively.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Soil volumetric water content (cm3 cm–3) at the 50-cm depth at Wye Research and Education Center (top) and Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (bottom), May–September 2002. * Denotes days on which differences in soil water content were significant at the 0.05 probability level (Bonferroni). ANOVA performed on soil moisture meter readings.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Soybean seed yield (kg ha–1) following no-till, no cover; no-till rye; no-till forage radish; or no-till forage radish + rye cover crop treatments at Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC) and Wye Research and Education Center (WREC). Mean separation within each site by LSD at the 0.10 probability level.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.