SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clough, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ford, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Clough, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ford, C. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Clough, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ford, C. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Global Change
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Soil Biology

Lime and Soil Moisture Effects on Nitrous Oxide Emissions from a Urine Patch

Tim J. Clougha,*, Francis M. Kelliherb, Robert R. Sherlocka and Colleen D. Forda

a Lincoln Univ., P.O. Box 84, Canterbury, New Zealand
b Landcare Research, P.O. Box 69, Canterbury, New Zealand



View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Effect of initial soil pH on N2O-N fluxes from the large soil cores over time under (a) field capacity and (b) saturated soil water conditions. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. (N = 3).

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Cumulative (a) N2O-N flux and (b) N2–N flux from the large soil cores after 85 d versus the initial soil pH. FC = field capacity, SAT = saturated. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. (N = 3). The dotted line represents linear regression of soil pH and cumulative N2 flux (P < 0.05, r2 = 0.26).

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of initial soil pH on N2–N fluxes from large soil cores over time under saturated soil water conditions. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. (N = 3).

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effect of initial soil pH on the changes in inorganic N in the small soil cores over time and the inorganic N remaining in the large soil cores on Day 85. Data are the average of both water treatments. (a) NH4–N, (b) NO2–N, and (c) NO3–N soil concentrations are shown. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. (N = 6).

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Effect of soil water treatment on inorganic N in the small soil cores over time and the inorganic N remaining in the large soil cores on Day 85. Data are the average of all soil pH treatments. (a) NH4–N, (b) NO2–N, and (c) NO3–N are shown. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. (N = 15).

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Effect of water-filled pore space (WFPS) on the N2O-N flux at three times following urine application, during small soil core destructive analysis. Water-filled pore space is the average of the entire soil core. Data points represent individual replicates. Fitted line is an exponential regression [y = 0.003exp(0.103x), r2 = 0.8] for all data points.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Changes in initial soil surface pH over time following urine application. Data are average over both water treatments. Error bars represent the least significant difference between means at 1% level, N = 6.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the Soil Science Society of America.