HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Peng, X. Articles by Horn, R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Peng, X. Articles by Horn, R. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Peng, X. Articles by Horn, R. Related Collections Soil Compaction Soil Models Soil Physics

Modeling Soil Shrinkage Curve across a Wide Range of Soil Types

^a Institute of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, CAU Kiel, Olshausenstr. 40, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
^b Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 821, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China

View larger version (25K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Schematic diagram for the typical shrinkage curve with four shrinkage zones.

View larger version (23K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Schematic comparisons of the water retention curve modeled by van Genuchten model (Eq. [3]) and the shrinkage curve modeled by Eq. [10]. Equation [4] and Eq. [7] are the basic shapes of water retention curve and soil shrinkage curve, respectively.

View larger version (25K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. The shrinkage curves from Reeve and Hall's six soils modeled by Eq. [10]. (a) Faulkbourne Bw, Faulkbourne Btg and Ragdale, (b) Wyre Bw, Wyre Bg and Faldbury. The square point (z, ez) is the end-point from residual shrinkage to zero shrinkage; the cross point (d, ed) is the dry-side maximum of the curvature; the diamond point (p, ep) is the end-point from the proportional shrinkage to residual shrinkage; the plus point (w, ew) is the end-point from structural shrinkage to proportional shrinkage.

View larger version (25K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4. The shrinkage curves from Talsma's soils with three levels of applied stress (P = 0; 6.3 and 11.2 kPa) modeled by Eq. [10]. The square point (z, ez) is the end-point from residual shrinkage to zero shrinkage; the cross point (d, ed) is the dry-side maximum of the curvature; the diamond point (p, ep) is the end-point from the proportional shrinkage to residual shrinkage.

View larger version (22K): [in a new window]   Fig. 5. The shrinkage curves from three Typic Chromexert soils modeled by Eq. [10]: The square point (z, ez) is the end-point from residual shrinkage to zero shrinkage; the cross point (d, ed) is the dry-side maximum of the curvature; the diamond point (p, ep) is the end-point from the proportional shrinkage to residual shrinkage; the plus point (w, ew) is the end-point from structural shrinkage to proportional shrinkage.

View larger version (30K): [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Effect of parameter of the Eq. [10] on soil shrinkage curve at a given m = 1.0 and n = 2.0.

View larger version (28K): [in a new window]   Fig. 7. Effect of parameter m of the Eq. [10] on soil shrinkage curve at a given = 1.0 and n = 2.0.

View larger version (29K): [in a new window]   Fig. 8. Effect of parameter n of the Eq. [10] on soil shrinkage curve at a given = 2.0 and m = 1.0.