SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 2 June 2005
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:983-989 (2005)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0352
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Logsdon, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Logsdon, S. D.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Logsdon, S. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Analysis
Right arrow Soil Methods/Instrumentation

Soil Dielectric Spectra from Vector Network Analyzer Data

S. D. Logsdon*

National Soil Tilth Lab., 2150 Pammel Dr., Ames, IA 50011



View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Dielectric spectra and Cole–Cole plots for water at 25°C.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Truncated coaxial sample holder used in this study.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The electrical sample length, determined as the slope of 2c/(4f1) as a function of expected {epsilon}a1/2 (square root of apparent permittivity), in which c is the speed of light and f1 is the measured frequency of the first minimum in the real scattering parameter (S11) (quarter wavelength).

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Example spectra of real and imaginary permittivity for Weld soil at water content of 0.346 m3 m–3, after subtracting the electrical conductivity component from the imaginary permittivity. The {epsilon}hf is the real permittivity at the high frequency limit. The {sigma} = is the component due to electrical conductivity.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Example resistivity spectra and Cole–Cole plots derived from the sample permittivity data (Weld at water content of 0.346 m3 m–3).

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Example permittivity spectra at the lowest water content, with hygroscopic (bw) and free (fw) water contents given for the duplicate samples (separated by comma) of each soil. The Weld and Okoboji soils indicate a relaxation (bulge) within the measured frequency range (indicated by arrows).

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Effect of water content and electrical conductivity on the real and imaginary components of permittivity (relaxation and electrical conductivity contributions) at 10 MHz.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.