SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 29 September 2005
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1822-1832 (2005)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0331
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ares, A.
Right arrow Articles by Flaming, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ares, A.
Right arrow Articles by Flaming, B. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ares, A.
Right arrow Articles by Flaming, B. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mechanical Impediance
Right arrow Soil Physics
Right arrow Forest Soils

Ground-Based Forest Harvesting Effects on Soil Physical Properties and Douglas-Fir Growth

Adrian Aresa,*, Thomas A. Terryb, Richard E. Millerc, Harry W. Andersonc and Barry L. Flamingd

a Weyerhaeuser Co., 2730 Pacific Blvd. Albany, OR 97322
b Weyerhaeuser Co., 505 N. Pearl, Centralia, WA 98531
c USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Olympia Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3625 93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, WA 98512
d ENSR International, 9521 Willows Rd. NE, Redmond, WA 98052



View larger version (177K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Location of the Fall River study area in coastal Washington, USA.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Area in each disturbance class and proportion of tree seedlings planted on each disturbance class at Fall River. Class 0 = No soil disturbance, Class 1 = Soil compaction preserving topsoil structure, Class 2 = Soil compaction altering topsoil structure, Class 6 = Presence of berms of soil and slash. Values are means ± one standard error.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Soil strength by soil disturbance class and tilled soil 14 to 17 mo after forest harvest at Fall River. Values are means with standard errors indicated for some depths. Class 0 = No soil disturbance, Class 1 = Soil compaction preserving topsoil structure, Class 2 = Soil compaction altering topsoil structure.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Water retention curves for non-compacted, compacted, and compacted and tilled soil at the (a) 0- to 10-cm, and (b) the 10- to 20-cm depth at Fall River. Values are means ± one standard error.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Volumetric soil water content during 2001 and 2002 at Fall River for DC2 compacted and DC0 non-compacted areas. Values are means ± one standard error.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.