Published online 27 October 2005
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1881-1890 (2005)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0225
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
Soil Water Retention
I. Introduction of a Shape Index
R. Haverkampa,*,
F. J. Leij,
C. Fuentesb,
A. Sciortinoc and
P. J. Rossd
a Laboratoire d'Etude des Transferts en Hydrologie et Environnement, LTHE (UMR 5564, CNRS, INPG, UJF, IRD), BP 53X, 38041, Grenoble, Cedex 9, France
b Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del Agua (IMTA), Paseo Cuauhnáhuac 8532, Col. Progresso 62550 Jiutepec, Morelos, Mexico
c Dep. of Civil Engineering, California State Univ., Long Beach, CA 90840, USA
d CSIRO Land and Water, Indooroopilly, Qld. 4067, Australia

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Textural distribution of databases: (a) 406 samples from UNSODA and (b) 660 samples from GRIZZLY.
|
|

View larger version (46K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Histogram of dry bulk density, b, and organic matter content, OM, for 660 samples from GRIZZLY.
|
|

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Histogram of the vG-shape factor mn0,2 optimized for 660 samples from GRIZZLY.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. The van Genuchten shape factor mn0,k for three different user indices, k, as a function of the Brooks-Corey shape parameter 0 for 660 samples from GRIZZLY.
|
|

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8. Distribution of shape index, P, calculated for 461 soil samples from UNSODA and 612 samples from GRIZZLY.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9. Shape index computed from retention data as a function of clay and sand percentage plotted for 51 data points for: (a) UNSODA, and (b) GRIZZLY.
|
|
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.