SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 27 October 2005
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1891-1901 (2005)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0226
© 2005 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leij, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leij, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, P. J.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Leij, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, P. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Retention/Capillary Pressure
Right arrow Inverse Procedures/Parameter Estimation
Right arrow Soil Physics

Soil Water Retention

II. Derivation and Application of Shape Index

F. J. Leij, R. Haverkampa,*, C. Fuentesb, F. Zatarainb and P. J. Rossc

a Laboratoire d'Etude des Transferts en Hydrologie et Environnement, LTHE (UMR 5564, CNRS, INPG, UJF, IRD), BP 53X, 38041, Grenoble, Cedex 9, France
b Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del Agua (IMTA), Paseo Cuauhnáhuac 8532, Col. Progresso 62550 Jiutepec, Morelos, Mexico
c CSIRO Land and Water, Indooroopilly, Qld. 4067, Australia



View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Outline of presentation of shape index with equation numbers for parameter conversion.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Shape index PvG computed for GRIZZLY according to Eq. [5] with k = 2, {theta}r = 0 as a function of clay and sand percentage.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Parametric shape index PBC according to Eq. [7] and PvG according to Eq. [9a], [10a], and [8], that is, the first- and second-order approximation and the exact expression, computed from optimized {theta}r, {theta}s, {lambda}, m, and n as a function of the experimental shape index, P, using samples from UNSODA with a positive {theta}r. Coefficients for the correlation between all shape indices are provided in the insert.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effect of {theta}r as an optimization parameter for k = 2 on 247 samples of GRIZZLY database: (a) mn2 as a function of mn0,2 and (b) PvG computed from optimization results with {theta}r > 0 versus results for {theta}r fixed at 0.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Parameter optimization to retention data from GRIZZLY with {theta}r = 0 using the BC and vG equations (k = 2): (a) {lambda}0 as a function of mn0,2 and (b) PBC as a function of PvG.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Optimizing vG equation to water content of 655 soils from GRIZZLY: RMSE if shape factor mn2 is independently predicted from BC equation with PBC = PvG versus RMSE if mn2 is included in the optimization.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Shape parameter {lambda}0 estimated from parameters of the vG equation, as a function of optimized {lambda}0 for 660 samples from GRIZZLY: (a) estimation from shape index, PvG, and (b) estimation with {lambda} = mn1.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. The effect of the user index, k, for optimizations of GRIZZLY data with {theta}r = 0: (a) shape parameters mn0,k for user index k = 0.5, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 as a function of mn0,2, and (b) shape index, PvG, for user index k = 0.5, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10, as a function of PvG for k = 2.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. The water retention shape index PvG as a function of mn0,k according to Eq. [5] for user index k = 0, 1, 2, 10 for the vG equation and k->{infty} for the BC equation.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. The effect of variations in {theta}r on shape parameters: (a) {lambda}/{lambda}0 and mn2/mn0,2 using a first- and second-order approximation (left-hand axis) and the distribution of samples with a nonzero {theta}r (right-hand axis) from GRIZZLY as a function of {theta}r/{theta}s and (b) mn2/mn0,2 using different m0,2 (left-hand axis) and the distribution of samples with a nonzero {theta}r (right-hand axis) from UNSODA.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11. Predictability of residual water content and shape factor with the first-order approximation of the shape index using Eq. [22]: (a) predicted versus optimized {theta}r/{theta}s and (b) predicted versus optimized mnk.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the Soil Science Society of America.