SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 27 February 2006
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:555-569 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0347
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Six, J.
Right arrow Articles by Batten, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Six, J.
Right arrow Articles by Batten, K. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Six, J.
Right arrow Articles by Batten, K. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Biogeochemical Processes
Right arrow Carbon Sequestration
Right arrow Microbial Processes

Bacterial and Fungal Contributions to Carbon Sequestration in Agroecosystems

J. Sixa,*, S. D. Freyb, R. K. Thietb and K. M. Battena

a Dep. of Plant Sciences, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616
b Dep. of Natural Resources, Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824


Figure 1
View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. This conceptual diagram depicts our current understanding of the microbial contribution to C sequestration in agroecosystems. Microbial C pool sizes are indicated by the relative size of the boxes, and the relative rate of C transfer from one pool to another (including CO2 evolution) is represented by arrow thickness. In Step I, substrate C is partitioned between bacterial and fungal biomass. The amount of C incorporated into biomass and metabolite production versus that lost as CO2 is dependent on the microbial growth efficiency of the microbial community. The amount of bacterial versus fungal biomass is also determined by the relative degree of protection conferred by the soil matrix (characterized by pore and aggregate size distribution and by clay type and content). In Step II, the rate of transfer of microbial biomass C to microbially derived organic matter is influenced by the chemical recalcitrance of microbial products, the sensitivity of decomposition to (micro)climatic factors, and differential interactions between bacterial and fungal products and the soil matrix. We suggest that a fungal-dominated microbial community improves the physical environment for C stabilization and produces more protected and stable C.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (57K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Glucosamine concentrations (g kg–1 soil) in soil of grassland ecosystems ({circ}), no-tillage agroecosystems ({blacktriangledown}) and conventional tillage agroecosystems ({blacksquare}), and their relationship with percent clay content, mean annual precipitation (MAP), and mean annual temperature (MAT). Data were obtained from Amelung et al. (1999c) for the grassland ecosystems and from Frey et al. (unpublished data) for the agroecosystems (the latter data were not included in the regression).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.