SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 29 March 2006
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:711-717 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0174
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gao, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gong, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gao, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gong, Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gao, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gong, Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Flow
Right arrow Soil Physics

Correcting Wall Flow Effect Improves the Heat-Pulse Technique for Determining Water Flux in Saturated Soils

Jianying Gao, Tusheng Ren and Yuanshi Gong*

College of Resource and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural Univ., Beijing, China 100094


Figure 1
View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Transient temperature changes at the downstream and upstream positions as related to the water flux density. The symbols represent measured data, and the lines indicate predicted results using the conduction–convection model.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Water flux density (J) estimated from the Td/Tu versus actual values measured at column outlet.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Transient temperature changes at the downstream and upstream positions at the largest flux densities. The symbols represent measured data, and the lines indicate predicted results of the conduction–convection–dispersion model as suggested by Hopmans et al. (2002). A thermal dispersion coefficient ({lambda}d) is arbitrarily selected to force the theoretical maximum temperature changes agree with the measured data.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Pictures from the ink-dying test, showing the color change (a) 1.5 min, (b) 6 min, and (c) 9 min from the moment when the color is noticeable at the top surface of a packed column.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Water flux density (J) estimated from the Td/Tu, with correction of wall flow effect, versus actual values at column outlet on the sandy loam and sandy clay loam soils.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.