SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online 23 May 2006
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1071-1081 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0177
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Regalado, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ritter, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Regalado, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ritter, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Regalado, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ritter, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forest Soils
Right arrow Spatial Distribution
Right arrow Volcanic Soils
Right arrow Water repellency
Right arrow Hydrophobicity

Geostatistical Tools for Characterizing the Spatial Variability of Soil Water Repellency Parameters in a Laurel Forest Watershed

C. M. Regaladoa,* and A. Ritterb

a Instituto Canario de Investigaciones Agrarias (ICIA), Dep. Suelos y Riegos, Apdo. 60 La Laguna, 38200 Tenerife, Spain
b Dep. Ingeniería, Producción y Economía Agrarias, ICIA and Univ. de La Laguna Ctra. Geneto, 2 La Laguna, 38200 S/C Tenerife, Spain


Figure 1
View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Watershed selected for soil sampling. (a) 3-D view; (b) rectangular grid (100 by 75 m); (c) grid at centimeter scale in the four points marked with squares in (b).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Example of repellency curve, indicating the parameters selected for its study.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Plots of local variances vs. local means computed from 150 by 300 m moving overlapping windows for the water repellency parameters and SOM.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. Experimental and fitted omnidirectional correlograms at meter scale.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5. Experimental and fitted omnidirectional correlograms at centimeter scale.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 6. Fractal omnidirectional semivariograms for S and SOM.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 7. Kriging maps for the water repellency parameters and SOM.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality		 The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.