SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 3 August 2006
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1522-1531 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0253
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mikha, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Benjamin, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mikha, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Benjamin, J. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mikha, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Benjamin, J. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nitrogen

Estimating Soil Mineralizable Nitrogen under Different Management Practices

Maysson M. Mikhaa,*, Charles W. Riceb and Joseph G. Benjamina

a USDA-ARS, Central Great Plains Research Station, 40335 County Rd. GG, Akron, CO 80720
b Dep. of Agronomy, 2004 Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506


Figure 1
View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Diagram showing the finite element grid for modeling water and heat movement. The line A-B represents the shelter (1/2 surface area). The dash lines represent the elements that received rainfall in the simulations. The heavy dash line indicated the runoff from the top of the shelter into the elements directly under the edge of the shelter.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The accuracy between measured and modeled soil temperature (for the Year 2000) under the shelter at the 0- to 5-cm depth using TRANSPOR model.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Measured and modeled soil water content under the shelter for 0- to 5, 5- to 15-, and 15- to 30-cm depths for the Year 2000.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Relationship between measured and predicted field N mineralization at 0- to 5-cm depth for 2000 vegetative stage of the growing season by manure application, mineral fertilizer application, and an unfertilized control. (Residual1) represents 10 yr of N application and 1 yr of residual N; (Residual6) represents 5 yr of N application and 6 yr of residual N.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Relationship between measured and predicted field N mineralization for all the treatments combination with Residual1 and Residual6 during the 2000 vegetative stage of growing season as affected by manure, NH4NO3, and 0-N control. (A) represents 0- to 5-cm depth and (B) represents 0- to 30-cm depth.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.