SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 27 October 2006
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1998-2007 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0046
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buczko, U.
Right arrow Articles by Hüttl, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Buczko, U.
Right arrow Articles by Hüttl, R. F.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Buczko, U.
Right arrow Articles by Hüttl, R. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Tillage
Right arrow Infiltration
Right arrow Hydraulic Conductivity

Tillage Effects on Hydraulic Properties and Macroporosity in Silty and Sandy Soils

U. Buczkoa,*, O. Bensb and R. F. Hüttlb

a Univ. of Rostock, Institute for Land Use, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 6, D-18059 Rostock, Germany
b Brandenburg Univ. of Technology, Cottbus, Chair of Soil Protection and Recultivation, P.O. Box 101344, D-03013 Cottbus, Germany


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Boxplots of Ks values for the conventional and conservation tillage plots of the Lietzen site, determined with the hood (HIF) and the ring (RIF) infiltrometer. The numbers of measurements are given in Table 3. Boxes denote the 25th and 75th percentiles positions, the continuous bar inside the box shows the median and the dash-dotted line the mean value; the whiskers denote the 10th and 90th percentiles; outliers are indicated as triangles. This notation applies also to subsequent box plots.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Boxplots of Ks values for the conventional and conservation tillage plots of the Adenstedt site, determined with the hood (HIF) and the ring (RIF) infiltrometer. The numbers of measurements are given in Table 3.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Boxplots of macroporosity values for the conventional and conservation tillage plots of the Adenstedt and Lietzen site, determined with the hood infiltrometer (HIF). The numbers of measurements are given in Table 4. For each study plot, the left side box plot denotes macroporosity values calculated with the approach of Watson and Luxmoore (1986), and the right side box plot denotes the values calculated with the method of Bodhinayake et al. (2004).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Measured water retention curves (0- to 10-cm soil depth) for the conventional and conservation tillage plots of the Adenstedt and Lietzen sites. The number of replications for each suction head and treatment/plot is n = 3. For better clearness of this graphic, error bars are not given.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.