SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 2007
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:75-85 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0055
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muscolo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nardi, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Muscolo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nardi, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Muscolo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nardi, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Humic Substances
Right arrow Plant and Soil Interactions

Biological Activity of Humic Substances Is Related to Their Chemical Structure

Adele Muscolo*, Maria Sidari and Emilio Attinà

Dipartimento di Gestione dei Sistemi Agrari, e Forestali, Università degli Studi Mediterranea, Feo di Vito, 89060 Reggio Calabria, Italy

Ornella Francioso

Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie, Agroambientali, Università di Bologna, Via Fanin 40, 40127 Bologna, Italy

Vitaliano Tugnoli

Dipartimento di Biochimica, Università di Bologna, Via Belmeloro 8/2, 40126 Bologna, Italy

Serenella Nardi

Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Agrarie, Facoltà di Agraria, Agripolis, Strada Romea 16–35020, Legnaro, Padova, Italy


Figure 1
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. The 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectra (8.0–0.6 ppm) of grass humic substance separated into fractions corresponding to high (HMWG) and low (LMWG) relative molecular mass. The peaks are attributed according to Fan (1996).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Region of 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectra (4.0–2.0 ppm range) of a forest humic substance. The humic substance was separated into fractions with high (HMWF) and low (LMWF) relative molecular mass. The peaks are attributed according to Fan (1996).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Region of 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectra (2.0–0.6 ppm range) of high (HMWF) and low (LMWF) relative molecular mass fractions. The peaks are attributed according to Fan (1996).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier-transform spectra of a humic substance separated in high (HMW) and low (LMW) relative molecular mass fractions. Humic substances (top) from grass are LMWG and HMWG and (bottom) from forest land are LMWF and HMWF.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.