SSSAJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 12 March 2007
Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:424-429 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0021
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, C.
Right arrow Articles by Clayton, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chang, C.
Right arrow Articles by Clayton, G.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chang, C.
Right arrow Articles by Clayton, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Fate
Right arrow Soil Analysis

Elevation-Based Soil Sampling to Assess Temporal Changes in Soil Constituents

C. Chang*, Ben Ellert, Xiying Hao and George Clayton

a Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, 5403 1st Ave. S. Lethbridge, AB, T1J 4B1, Canada


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Three possible temporal changes, from t = 1 to t = 2, in a soil profile: (I) no change in volume or mass, (II) increase in surface elevation, and (III) decrease in surface elevation.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Contour in the experimental area, treatment, and plot layout in 2005.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Relationship between relative elevations determined in 1990 and in 2005 for the 21 wells at the experimental site.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Comparison of three approaches to extimate change in soil C from 1973 to 2003: (a) fixed depth of 60 cm, (b) fixed soil mass 7950 Mg ha–1, and (c) fixed subsurface elevation for the example with surface elevation increasing by 24 cm. BD = bulk density, OC = organic carbon.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.