SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seol, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Seol, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, L. S.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Seol, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, L. S.
Soil Science Society of America Journal 64:1976-1983 (2000)
© 2000 Soil Science Society of America

DIVISION S-2-SOIL CHEMISTRY

Effect of Dissolved Organic Matter in Treated Effluents on Sorption of Atrazine and Prometryn by Soils

Yongkoo Seol and Linda S. Lee

Dep. of Agronomy, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907-1150 USA

lslee{at}purdue.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Conclusions
 REFERENCES
 
The apparent enhanced transport of soil-applied atrazine following irrigation of treated effluents has been hypothesized to be from complexation of atrazine with effluent-borne dissolved organic matter (DOM). Under long-term effluent irrigation, even small DOM-induced decreases in pesticide sorption can result in significant enhanced pesticide movement due to cumulative effects. The effect of atrazine and prometryn association with DOM extracted from municipal wastewater (MW), swine-derived lagoon wastewater (SW), and dissolved Aldrich humic acid (HA) on sorption by two soils was measured in batch equilibration studies. Individual association of pesticides to DOM, sorption of DOM to soil, and pesticide sorption by soil were also quantified. Pesticide association to DOM normalized to organic carbon (OC) ranged from 30 to 1000 L/kg OC. DOM sorption by soil ranged from 1.5 to 10 L/kg with a silt loam having a higher affinity for the DOM than the sandy loam. DOM up to 150 mg OC/L did not significantly suppress sorption by soils of either atrazine or prometryne in agreement with predictions using the independently measured binary distribution coefficients in a model that assumed linear equilibrium behavior among pesticide, soil, and DOM. A sensitivity analysis was performed using the same model to identify what combination of soil, pesticide, and DOC variables may suppress sorption, resulting in facilitated transport. Results from the sensitivity analysis are presented and the potential for effluent properties other than DOM to facilitate pesticide transport is discussed.

Abbreviations: BF, Bloomfield • CEC, cation-exchange capacity • COD, chemical oxygen demand • DOC, dissolved organic carbon • DOM, dissolved organic matter • DR, Drummer • HOCs, hydrophobic organic compounds • HA, humic acid • HPLC, High Performance Liquid wastewater • SOC, soil organic carbon • SOM, soil organic matter • SW, swine effluent


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Conclusions
 REFERENCES
 
EFFORTS TO ABATE pollution and supplement available water resources in many parts of the world have resulted in the increased use of effluents for irrigation. In semiarid areas, where fresh water is limited, the use of effluents for agricultural purpose has been common practice over the last few decades (Rebhun et al., 1987; Ronen and Magaritz, 1985). In the USA, treated effluent is one of the fastest growing sources of water for irrigating both agricultural and recreational facilities such as golf course, parks, school grounds and street medians (Miller, 1990). One potential side effect of this practice is the long-term deterioration of groundwater quality. Organic chemicals originally present in the wastewater and soil-borne organic pollutants have been identified in ground water at effluent-irrigated sites (Hutchins et al., 1985), or at greater depths in the soil profile than observed at sites irrigated with only high quality water (Muszkat et al., 1993; Graber et al., 1995). Effluent characteristics that may impact mobility of soil-borne chemicals include DOM, ionic strength, ionic composition, and pH.

Complexation or association of strongly hydrophobic substances (e.g., polychlorinated biphenyls, polyaromatic hydrocarbons, and organochlorine pesticides) with dissolved or colloidal organic matter resulting in the enhanced aqueous solubility, decreased sorption, and enhanced transport has been clearly documented in batch and column studies (Chiou et al., 1986; Dunnivant et al., 1992; Enfield et al., 1989; Hassett and Anderson, 1982; Hutchins et al., 1985; Kan and Tomson, 1990; McCarthy and Jimenez, 1985; Vinten and Nye, 1983; Chin et al., 1991). Based on studies with primarily aquatic humic substances, Chin et al. (1991) concluded that the influence of organic colloids on sorption of organic compounds where hydrophobic interactions dominated would be small for compounds with octanol-water partition coefficients (Kow) <105, especially given the low DOM concentrations typically in aquatic and subsurface water systems. However, in aqueous solutions containing dissolved organic matter from various sources including sludge, crop residues, and secondary wastewater, decreases in sorption or enhanced transport have also been observed for weakly basic or nonionic, moderately soluble pesticides (Kow <103) (Lee and Farmer, 1989; Barriuso et al., 1992; Graber et al., 1995; Celis et al., 1998; Nelson et al., 1998).

In addition to intrinsic solute properties, the concentration, source, size, polarity, and molecular configuration of organic colloids will effect their impact on solubility, thus sorption of organic chemicals. In solubility enhancement studies of hydrophobic organic compounds (HOCs) with humic and fulvic acids, Chiou et al. (1986) found the affinity of hydrophobic chemicals to associate with dissolved organic substances as follows: soil-derived humics > soil-derived fulvics > aquatic humics > aquatic fulvics. Complexation of s-triazines to DOM using well-characterized humic acids suggest that complexation occurs through either proton or electron transfer depending on the acidity of the humic acid and the basicity of the traizine rather than simple hydrophobic interactions (Senesi et al., 1987; Sposito et al., 1996). In addition to association of chemicals to DOM, DOM applied to soils can sorb to soil surfaces, resulting in an overall enhancement in sorption and retardation, as demonstrated by Totsche et al. (1997) for HOCs with forest floor-derived DOM. Therefore, the impact of DOM on sorption and subsequent transport will be dependent on the intrinsic nature of the solute, soil, and DOM, and the competition among solute–soil, solute–DOM, and DOM–soil interactions.

In this study, the impact of effluent DOM extracted from swine waste lagoon effluent and municpal waste water effluent, as well as a well-characterized humic acid on triazine sorption, was measured. The association of atrazine and prometryne to DOM, sorption of DOM by soil, and pesticide sorption by soil were individually quantified to evaluate the impact of effluent–DOM on pesticide sorption, and subsequent mobility potential under effluent-irrigation. A sensitivity analysis using a model that assumed linear equilibrium behavior among solute, soil, and DOM was performed to identify what combination of soil, pesticide, and DOC variables may result in facilitated transport.


    Materials and methods
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Conclusions
 REFERENCES
 
Pesticides
Two high purity s-triazine herbicides with different functional groups, atrazine (6-chloro-N2-ethyl-N4-isopropyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine, 98.8%, Lot no. 153-122B), and prometryn [N,N'-bis(1-methylethyl)-6-(methylthio)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine, 99.5%, Lot no. 152-95B], were obtained from Chem Service (West Chester, PA). Selected properties of atrazine and prometryn are listed in Table 1 .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Selected physical and chemical properties of atrazine and prometryn

 
Soils
A sandy loam low in OC (Bloomfield soil, BF) and a silt loam with higher amounts of OC (Drummer soil, DR) collected from AP horizons in the Midwest were selected for this study. Soils were air-dried and passed through a 2-mm sieve. Soil characteristics are listed for pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), particle size analysis, and OC in Table 2 .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Physical and chemical properties of soils

 
Effluent Collection and Dissolved Organic Matter Extraction
Secondary effluents were collected from the West Lafayette Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant and from the last cell in the lagoon system for treating swine-derived wastes at the Purdue Animal Science Research Farm, West Lafayette, IN. The SW from the last cell is frequently spread on nearby farmland by sprinkler or surface irrigation and the treated municipal wastewater is dumped directly into the river. Prior to use, the municipal effluent was filtered sequentially through a Gelman Supor–800 0.8-µm glass filter (Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI) and a Gelman Supor–450 0.45-µm membrane filter (Gelman Sciences) held in a Millipore 316 stainless sanitary filter holder (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA). The swine effluent contained a large amount of suspended materials, therefore centrifugation (2000 g for 4 h) was used to remove the suspended materials rather than filtration. The filtered or centrifuged effluents were concentrated with a Millipore PLAC Prep/Scale ultra-filtration cartridge (Millipore Corp.) with a nominal molecular cut-off of 1000 Da, which was selected based on reports that DOM greater than this fraction had higher binding capacities (Wang et al., 1990). Samples were continuously circulated through the ultra-filtration cartridge until sufficient DOM had been concentrated from the effluent. The concentrated DOM sample was filtered sequentially using a Whatman Glass Microfiber 0.7-µm filter (Whatman Chemical Separation, Clifton, NJ) to remove any particulates generated in the concentration step, followed by a Gelman Supor–200 0.2-µm membrane filter (Gelman Sciences) for filter sterilization to minimize microbial activity. Therefore, DOM was restricted to macromolecules between 1000 Da and 2 µm. DOM samples were freeze-dried and stored in a refrigerator (4°C). Aldrich (HA) (Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals, St. Louis, MO) was included for comparison. Humic acid was purified before use to reduce ash content; then 1 g was dissolved in 1 L of 0.005 M CaCl2 solution. The pH of the solution was increased up to 11 with 0.1 M NaOH, agitated for 1 h, and titrated with 0.1 M HCl to pH of 7. To ensure HA within the size range from 1000 Da to 0.2 µm defined for this study, the neutralized solution was centrifuged at 13 500 g for 1 h, filtered with a 0.2-µm membrane filter, and placed in dialysis tubing with a molecular weight cut off of 1000 Da for 2 d before freeze drying.

Dissolved Organic Matter Characterization
Freeze-dried DOM samples (HA, MW, and SW) were analyzed for C and N content with Fisons NA 1500 NC Analyzer (Fisons Scientific Equipment, Loughborough, UK). Dried materials were dissolved in 0.005 M CaCl2 solution for characterization of pH, OC content (mg OC/L), inorganic C content (IC, mg C/L), and total acidity. For total acidity, 15 mL of NaOH (0.101 M) was mixed with 10 mL of DOM solution in 250-mL amber bottles and shaken for 24 h. The mixed solutions were titrated with HCl (0.0206 M) to obtain the total acidity of DOM. OC and IC contents in DOM solutions were measured with a Dohrmann TOC analyzer (Rosemount Analytical, Dohrmann Division, Santa Clara, CA). Reported DOM concentrations are OC-based concentrations (DOC).

Interaction between Pesticide and Dissolved Organic Matter
The binding coefficients of pesticides to DOM from effluents were measured using a dialysis technique (Carter and Suffet, 1982). Spectral/Por 6 dialysis tubing (Spectrum Medical Industries, Houston, TX) with a molecular weight cut off of 1000 Da was washed in distilled water, 1 M Na2CO3, twice in 1 M NaHCO3, and once again in distilled water. Freeze-dried DOM samples were dissolved in 0.005 M CaCl2 solution at 140 mg OC/L for MW, 320 mg OC/L for SW, and 690 mg OC/L for HA. Aliquots of 5 or 10 mL were placed in dialysis tubing, and placed in 35-mL test tubes containing 5 or 10 mL of 0.005 M CaCl2 solution ranging in pesticide concentrations from 0 to 20 mg/L. Tubes were wrapped with aluminum foil to minimize photolysis, and shaken on a platform shaker for 2 d at 21 ± 2°C. Each experiment included three tubes without DOM to verify that pesticide concentrations inside and outside of the bag were equal after 2 d (i.e., equilibrium achieved). Pesticide concentrations inside and outside the dialysis tubing were determined using a Shimadzu Automated High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) system (Shimadzu, Kyto, Japan) with a UV-vis detector ({lambda} = 254 nm), a Supelcosil ABZ+ reversed-phase column (Supelco, Supelco Park, Bellefonte, PA), and a mobile phase of 65/35 acetonitrile/water at a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min. Complete dissociation of the pesticide–DOM complex in the acetonitrile-water mobile phase during HPLC analysis was confirmed by comparing known pesticide concentrations in the presence and absence of DOM. The difference between pesticide concentrations inside and outside of the dialysis tubing was assumed to be the DOM-bound pesticide concentrations. A linear regression between bound pesticide (mg/kg OC) and free pesticide (mg/L) yields a slope equal to KDOCi.

Interaction between Dissolved Organic Matter and Soil
Varying amounts of soil (0–5 g) were shaken for 2 d with a fixed volume (5 mL) of DOM solution. For sorption by DR, initial DOM solution concentrations were {approx}440, 110, and 300 mg OC/L for HA, MW, and SW, respectively. For BF, sorption of only HA was measured with initial concentrations of 84 mg OC/L. After shaking, samples were centrifuged (1000 g for 30 min) and OC content was measured in the supernatants using a Dohrmann TOC analyzer (Rosemount Analytical). Decrease in DOC concentration because of adsorption to the containers was not observed in blank samples without soil. Tubes with only soil and 0.005 M CaCl2 solution were used to account for soil organic matter solubilized during equilibration. The OC-normalized distribution coefficient of DOM between the soil and aqueous phase, KSDOC = DOCS/DOCW, was estimated assuming DOM sorption obeys a linear isotherm and applying mass balance equations using the following relationship (Magee et al., 1991)

(1)
where mS is soil mass (g), VW is solution volume (mL), and DOCO and DOC*W are OC-based DOM (kg OC/L) concentrations in the applied solution and remaining in the bulk water after equilibration, respectively, with DOC*W corrected for SOC released in control solutions containing no DOM. A linear regression between DOCO/DOCW and mS/VW yields a slope equal to KSDOC.

Pesticides, Soil, and Dissolved Organic Matter Interactions
Pesticide sorption coefficients (KSi and KSi,DOC) were measured for each pesticide–soil–DOM combination using batch isotherm experiments. Soil/water ratios were selected to achieve {approx}50% sorption using reported KSOCi values and soil fSOC. Pesticide solutions of varying concentrations in a 0.005 M CaCl2 matrix, either with no DOM or at a single fixed DOM concentration, was added to air-dried soil in 17-mL glass test tubes with Teflon-lined screw caps and equilibrated in a end-over-end shaker for 2 d at 22 ± 1°C. The DOM concentration used was between 60 to 150 mg C/L depending on the DOM source. SW DOM and dissolved HA were used for Drummer while only dissolved HA was used in the Bloomfield soil experiments. Samples were centrifuged for 30 min at 1000 g and the supernatants were directly analyzed for the pesticides by HPLC/UV as previously described. KSi and KSi,DOC values were estimated from the slope of a linear regression between sorbed and apparent solution pesticide concentrations.


    Results and discussion
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Conclusions
 REFERENCES
 
Effluent Dissolved Organic Matter Characterization
Chemical analyses of final DOM solutions used in the different interaction studies are summarized in Table 3 . Also shown for comparison are selected characteristics of the raw effluent after filtration or centrifugation in Table 3. Final DOM solutions were prepared at elevated DOC concentration relative to the initial effluent to expand the DOM range investigated. Because of the ultra-filtration step, IC contents were significantly reduced. The pH values of DOM solutions were also 0.5 to 0.7 pH units lower than the initial effluents. Changes in solution pH may impact the behavior of weak bases such as the triazines. However, for the effluent and soil solution pH range investigated in these studies, both atrazine and prometryn were 99.99% neutral.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Selected characterization of the initial effluents and laboratory prepared dissolved organic matter (DOM) solutions

 
Pesticide–Dissolved Organic Matter, Pesticide–Soil, and Dissolved Organic Matter–Soil Interactions
Linear OC normalized distribution coefficients estimated from the individual pesticide–DOM , pesticide–soil (KSOCi), and DOM–soil distribution sorption studies are summarized in Table 4 , and in Fig. 1 and 2 . Prometryn showed higher association than atrazine to both DOM and soil organic carbon (SOC). The log KDOCi values for atrazine and prometryne to HA of 2.24 and 3.02, respectively, are in good agreement with values of 2.3 for atrazine and 2.96 for prometryn predicted from the log KOW - log KDOCi correlation reported by Chin et al. (1991) for binding of nonionizable hydrophobic chemicals with Fluka (Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals, St. Louis, MO) and Aldrich humic acids.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4 Results of individual batch isotherm experiments

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Association of pesticides to DOM from municipal waste effluent (MW), swine effluent (SW), and Aldrich humic acid (HA). DOM concentrations were as follows: 136 mg OC/L for MW, 320 mg/L for SW, and 690 mg OC/L for HA. Lines represent linear regressions with zero intercepts

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 Sorption of DOM from municipal waste effluent (MW), swine effluent (SW), and Aldrich humic acid (HA) by Drummer (DR) and Bloomfield (BF) soils. Initial DOM concentrations applied to DR were 110 mg OC/L for MW, 300 mg OC/L for SW, and 440 mg OC/L for HA, and 84 mg OC/L of HA was applied to BF

 
Both pesticides showed higher affinity to HA than either MW or SW DOM. The presence of polar functional groups in a C domain (e.g., O, N, and S) can decrease the overall hydrophobicity of the C domain, thus reducing its affinity to interact with hydrophobic organic chemicals. Huang (1999) found C/(N + O) weight ratios of 0.83 to 0.94 for DOM extracted from the last cell of a lagoon treatment system for cow and swine wastes, respectively, compared with 1.74 for HA, which supports the greater affinity of HA for the pesticides. The MW DOM showed a greater affinity for the pesticides than SW DOM. Therefore, although MW effluent typically has less DOM than animal-derived effluents, a higher KDOCi value means DOM from municipal wastes can be a more effective carrier of organic chemicals.

Dissolved organic matter (DOM) sorption to soil (KSDOC) was greatest for HA and smallest for SW, similar to what was observed for the association of a given pesticide to DOM: HA > MW > SW. Humic acid (HA) sorption was significantly lower on the Bloomfield soil compared with the Drummer soil. Bloomfield is a much sandier soil with lower OC, clay content, CEC, and surface area, all of which would impact DOM sorption.

The ratios of KDOCi/ KSOCi summarized in Table 4 were calculated to assess the relative affinity of pesticides to DOC vs. SOC. The KDOCi/KSOCi ratios of both pesticides were greater than 1.0 for HA and MW DOM, and prometryn showed greater ratios than atrazine. Similar trends can be cited for nonpolar organic chemicals. Phenanthrene binding to organic matter water extracted from a clayey silty loam (5.9% OM), and dissolved HA resulted in KDOCi values of 43 800 L/kg (Magee et al., 1991) and 50 000 L/kg (Gauthier et al., 1986), respectively, which is much higher than the commonly reported KSOCi value for phenanthrene of 16000 L/kg. However, Chiou et al. (1986) found KDOCi values measured for the association of several chlorinated organic chemicals to alkaline-extracted organic matter to be consistently less than reported KSOCi values.

Values of KDOCi/KSOCi greater than unity will result in a greater potential for DOM to facilitate pesticide transport; however, the latter may be counteracted by a concomitant increase in sorption of DOM by soils. For the DOM in this study, sorption of DOM by soils followed a similar trend as the association of a given pesticide with the same DOM sources (i.e., HA > MW > SW). DOM that sorbs to the soil will in turn serve as an additional sorption domain for pesticides. The net effect can not only minimize enhanced transport potential, but result in an overall increase in sorption and subsequent decrease in mobility.

Pesticide–Soil–Dissolved Organic Matter Systems
The net impact of DOM on pesticide sorption from the combined interactions among pesticide, soil, and DOM was measured using batch isotherm experiments and estimated using a simple model that assumes linear equilibrium distribution behavior among soil, solute, and DOM. The overall distribution coefficient of a pesticide in a soil–water system containing DOM is, by definition

(2)

From Eq. [2], KSi,DOC can be defined in terms of the individual linear distribution coefficients by applying a series of mass-balance equations, assuming linear distribution behavior among all constituents, mass conservation of DOM, and no competition between DOM and pesticide for adsorption sites on soil

(3)

Various forms of Eq. [3] and the concepts incorporated therein have been applied by others to assess the effect of DOM on solubility, sorption, and transport (Gschwend and Wu, 1985; Chiou et al., 1986; Enfield et al., 1989; Magee et al., 1991; Knabner et al., 1996).

Batch isotherms for pesticide sorption by BF and DR soils in the presence and absence of DOM are shown in Fig. 3 , and the slopes (KSi,DOC) from the linear isotherm fits are summarized in Table 5 . Also shown in Table 5 is the percent change in pesticide sorption upon addition of DOM, with a negative sign representing a decrease in sorption. The lines shown in Fig. 3 are predictions using Eq. [3] with the individual distribution coefficients summarized in Table 4. In almost all cases pesticide sorption increased in the presence of DOM, with the exception of prometryne sorption in the presence of HA (97 mg C/L). DOM-pesticide interactions were counteracted by the concomitant sorption of DOM by soils resulting in decreases in available DOM and additional sorptive domains on the soil. The KSi,DOC values estimated from Eq. [3] were generally in very good agreement with measured values (Table 5) with one exception: Eq. [3] predicted a substantial increase in sorption of prometryn in the presence of HA whereas a decrease was observed.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Sorption of pesticide by Drummer (DR) and Bloomfield (BF) soils in the presence and absence of DOM from different sources. Numbers in parentheses are DOM concentrations in mg OC/L, and lines are Eq. [3] predictions

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5 Measured and predicted distribution coefficients of pesticides to soils in the presence and absence of DOM.{dagger}

 
To identify what combination of soil, pesticide, and DOC variables may result in DOM-facilitated transport, a series of simulations with Eq. [3] were performed across a range of soil-water distribution coefficients, KD (KD = fSOCKSOCi 0.1 to 100), KDOCi values (100–104), and KSDOC values (0–5). The simulation program was specified to report the minimum DOC concentration (DOCo) that would result in a 2% decrease in pesticide sorption (KSi,DOC <= 0.98 fSOCKSOCi). The subset of results that focuses on soil–pesticide combinations resulting in KD values less than 20 L/kg is shown in Fig. 4A . As KSDOC values approach zero and as KDOCi increases, increasing amounts of DOC are needed to cause a 2% decrease in sorption for all combinations. Graber et al. (1995) observed a decrease in atrazine sorption from 1.07 to 0.93 ({approx}13% suppression) in the presence of treated effluent containing 70 to 150 mg/L DOC, which was estimated from the reported chemical oxygen demand (COD) range of 181 to 394 mg/L. Simulating this scenario with Eq. [3], assuming no sorption of DOM to soil (KSDOC = 0) and a KDOCi of 100 to 200 gives estimates of a 1.5 to 3% decrease in sorption in the presence of 150 mg DOC/L (Fig. 4B), which is much less than observed. A much larger KDOCi value in the order of 1000 was required for Eq. [3] to predict the decrease in sorption observed in the laboratory studies suggesting the influence of other effluent properties. However, it is worth noting that under long-term effluent irrigation, even small DOC-induced decreases in pesticide sorption can result in significant enhanced pesticide movement in the field because of the cumulative effects over time.



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4 Equation [3] estimates for the minimium DOCo concentrations needed to produce a 2% decrease in pesticide sorption, i.e., KSi,DOC <= 0.98 fSOCKSOCi for values of KD (fSOC* KSOCi) < 20 L/kg (upper graph); and for a case where KD (fSOC* KSOCi) is near unity, KSDOC = 0 and KDOCi = 100 and 200 (lower graph)

 
Additional effluent properties that may be responsible for decreasing sorption include effluent pH, alkalinity, suspended solids, and dissolved salts, none of which were included in either the batch isotherm studies or model simulations. In the study by Graber et al. (1995), the pH of the treated effluent relative to the high quality water was similar, but effluent electrical conductivity was much higher, consistent with the higher inorganic ion concentrations (e.g., Ca2+, Na+, NH+4). Bicarbonate (HCO-3) concentrations were higher, indicative of higher buffer capacities, and the suspended solids concentration in the effluent was significant (60–226 mg/L). The presence of dissolved salts can promote the dissolution of SOM (Reemstma et al., 1999), where pesticides may be sorbed thereby mobilizing contaminants otherwise retained by the soil surface. Reemstma et al. (1999) also demonstrated that the rate of SOM release and the quality of SOM released was impacted by salt type. Increases in soil–solution pH, which is controlled by the pH and buffer capacity of both soil and effluent, can also promote SOM dissolution. Also under natural field conditions, soil undergoes wetting and drying cycles that can result in DOM accumulation, enhanced SOM solubilization, and an increase in the strength of the DOM-pesticide complex (Williams et al., 1998).


    Conclusions
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Conclusions
 REFERENCES
 
The net effect of pesticide association with DOM on pesticide sorption is dependent on the nature of, and interactions among, the pesticide, soil, and DOM. For moderately polar s-triazines, sorption data and model simulations indicate that the association with effluent DOM will have a small to negligible impact on pesticide sorption in most cases. However, under long-term effluent irrigation, even a small suppression in sorption may lead to enhanced pesticide movement especially when coupled to the potential influence of other effluent properties as well as transient field-scale processes.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This research was funded in part by the Purdue University Research Program and USDA-BARD under contract IS-2384-94. Approved for publication as Purdue Agricultural Research Programs Journal Series no. 15961. Special thanks are extended to Judy Santini for her help in the sensitivity analysis.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Materials and methods
 Results and discussion
 Conclusions
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
Y. Drori, Z. Aizenshtat, and B. Chefetz
Sorption-Desorption Behavior of Atrazine in Soils Irrigated with Reclaimed Wastewater
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 29, 2005; 69(6): 1703 - 1710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
T. Ilani, E. Schulz, and B. Chefetz
Interactions of Organic Compounds with Wastewater Dissolved Organic Matter: Role of Hydrophobic Fractions
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2005; 34(2): 552 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
D. Said-Pullicino, G. Gigliotti, and A. J. Vella
Environmental Fate of Triasulfuron in Soils Amended with Municipal Waste Compost
J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2004; 33(5): 1743 - 1751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
P. Fine, A. Hass, R. Prost, and N. Atzmon
Organic Carbon Leaching from Effluent Irrigated Lysimeters as Affected by Residence Time
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2002; 66(5): 1531 - 1539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
Y. Seol and L. S. Lee
Coupled Effects of Treated Effluent Irrigation and Wetting-Drying Cycles on Transport of Triazines through Unsaturated Soil Columns
J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2001; 30(5): 1644 - 1652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seol, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Seol, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, L. S.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Seol, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, L. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality