SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Soma, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Soma, M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Soma, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Dryland Soils
Right arrow Pedology
Right arrow Soil Mineralogy
Soil Science Society of America Journal 65:516-526 (2001)
© 2001 Soil Science Society of America

DIVISION S-9-SOIL MINERALOGY

Potassium-Selective, Halloysite-Rich Soils Formed in Volcanic Materials from Northern California

T. Takahashia, R.A. Dahlgrenb, B.K.G. Thengc, J.S. Whittonc and M. Somad

a Akita Prefectural University, Nakano, Shimo-Shinjo, Akita 010-0195, Japan
b Dep. of Land, Air and Water Resources, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616
c Landcare Research, PB 11052, Palmerston North, New Zealand
d Institute for Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Shizuoka, Shizuoka 422-8526, Japan

Corresponding author (radahlgren{at}ucdavis.edu)


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Several subsoil horizons of Andic Haploxeralfs, formed in volcanic ejecta under a xeric moisture regime in northern California, retain large amounts of exchangeable K+ and show high K+ saturation. The relationships between clay mineralogy, mineral charge characteristics, and exchangeable K+–Ca2+ selectivity were examined. Clay mineralogy and surface charge were assessed by x-ray diffractometry (XRD), differential thermal analysis (DTA), transmission electron microscopy, x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), 27Al-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, total elemental analysis, surface area measurements, and determination of K+–Ca2+ selectivity coefficients. Kaolin minerals with a tubular morphology comprise 75 to 91% of the clay-size fraction in the subsoil horizons. Kaolinite was prevalent in the surface horizons, while halloysite concentrations and the degree of halloysite hydration increased with depth. No detectable amounts of 2:1 layer silicates, 1:1–2:1 mixed-layer clays, or zeolites (e.g., clinoptilolite) were found in the clay-size fraction of the subsoil horizons. Soil samples dominated by halloysite showed a strong selectivity for K+. The clay fractions (<2 µm) have cation-exchange capacity (CEC) values ranging from 19 to 26 cmolc kg-1 and surface areas from 90 to 112 m2 g-1. The variable and permanent charge components were 11 and 20 cmolc kg-1, respectively. The 27Al-NMR spectrum of the halloysite-rich clay indicates a poorly ordered kaolin and a tetrahedral Al content of {approx}2%. While a disordered halloysite may be responsible for the high surface area, CEC, and K+ selectivity displayed by these soils, the contribution from 2:1 layer silicates and 1:1–2:1 mixed-layer clays in the silt and sand fractions and Fe oxide surface coatings must also be considered.

Abbreviations: CEC, cation-exchange capacity • DTA, differential thermal analysis • NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance • XPS, x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy • XRD, x-ray diffractometry


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
THE CLAY mineralogy of soils formed in volcanic materials varies widely depending on such factors as the composition of the parent material, stage of soil formation, pH, soil moisture regime, and the accumulation of organic matter (Shoji et al., 1993). Poorly ordered materials such as allophane, imogolite, ferrihydrite, and Al– and Fe–humus complexes often dominate the clay-size fraction of volcanic soils. Halloysite, a more ordered phase, is also a common constituent of many volcanic soils. Kaolin minerals can show a wide range of structural disorder (Churchman and Theng, 1984; Soma et al., 1992; Newman et al., 1994) due primarily to Al-vacancy displacements in the octahedral sheet (Plançon and Tchoubar, 1977a, 1977b; Soma et al., 1992). These vacancies may originate from nonstoichiometric substitution of Fe3+ for Al3+ in the octahedral sheet (Soma et al., 1992). Variable effects of hydration might also add to the degree of disorder in halloysite.

An Andisol -> Inceptisol -> Alfisol progression is observed in soil formation from volcaniclastic materials under the xeric soil moisture regime in northern California (Takahashi et al., 1993). In this sequence, the clay mineralogy (<2 µm) is dominated by allophanic materials and/or halloysite, often with minor amounts of gibbsite, 2:1 layer silicates, and Al–humus complexes. The coexistence of allophanic materials and halloysite in these soils may be due to their differential formation. This is possible because the Si concentrations in the soil solution fluctuate widely under the xeric soil moisture regime, and/or short range–ordered products can transform into more ordered minerals upon seasonal desiccation (Takahashi et al., 1993). The clay fraction of the subsurface horizons is almost exclusively composed of halloysite and accumulates large amounts of exchangeable K (Takahashi et al., 1993). The halloysite-rich clays in these horizons also possess a high CEC as well as a high K+ selectivity compared with most halloysites reported in the literature.

There have been several reports of soils derived from volcanic materials having a strong K+ or NH+4 retention (e.g., Okamura and Wada, 1984; Quantin et al., 1988; Delvaux et al., 1989, 1990a, 1990b, 1992; Fontaine et al., 1989; Espino-Mesa and Hernandez-Moreno, 1994; Escudey and Galindo, 1988; Escudey et al., 1997). High K+ (or NH+4) selectivity has been explained in terms of a K+- or NH+4-selective halloysite (Wada and Odahara, 1993; Okamura and Wada, 1984), the presence of a halloysite–smectite mixed-layer clay (Delvaux et al., 1990a, 1990b), the possible preferential repulsion of divalent cations by Fe oxide coatings (Escudey and Galindo, 1988; Escudey et al., 1997), whole salt (KCl) retention by halloysite (Wada, 1958, 1959; Thomas, 1960), the possible formation of an alunite phase [KAl3(OH)6(SO4)2] (Espino-Mesa and Hernandez-Moreno, 1994), and the presence of mica or vermiculite contaminants (Parfitt, 1992). To date, no common mechanism has been identified to account for this high K+ selectivity. It is important to note that most of the halloysite samples in these previous studies were not pure specimens, and therefore the results may be affected by 2:1 contaminants. Here we examine the relationship between the clay mineralogy and the surface charge and K+ selectivity characteristics associated with soils formed in volcanic materials in the xeric moisture regime of northern California.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Study Area and Soil Samples
The study area is located in the vicinity of Mt. Shasta in northern California (Takahashi et al., 1993). This area has a typical Mediterranean climate resulting in a xeric soil moisture regime. The mean annual precipitation is {approx}1000 mm, almost all of which occurs during the period November to March. The mean annual air temperature is 8 to 10°C. The soils are formed in andesitic lava or andesitic basalt flows and are overlain by rhyolitic ash (25–40 cm) from Holocene eruptions. Soil formation proceeds through an Andisol -> Inceptisol -> Alfisol progression.

Out of the five pedons previously studied (Takahashi et al., 1993), we selected two pedons (LeTrab series: fine-loamy, halloysitic, mesic, Andic Haploxeralf; Red Tank series: fine, halloysitic, mesic, Andic Haploxeralf) for this investigation because their subsurface horizons (2Bt1–2Bt3) had high exchangeable K+ concentrations and K+ saturation (K/ECEC = 0.25–0.39) (Table 1). These horizons have their clay mineralogy dominated by halloysite and display a moderate to high degree of weathering as evidenced by the high clay (32–68%) and free Fe oxide (5–10 wt. % Fe) concentrations.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Selected properties of the <2-mm fraction

 
Analyses of Clay Mineralogy and Surface Charge Characteristics
The clay-size fraction (<2 µm) was isolated after removal of organic matter with 5% H2O2 (boiling) and free Fe oxides with citrate-dithionite (Soil Survey Staff, 1984). The Fe that was not extractable by citrate-dithionite was assumed to be part of the layer silicate structure. Unless otherwise noted we used the Na+-saturated, deferrated clay samples for the following analyses. Cation-exchange capacity was determined using 0.5 M CaOAc solution at pH 7.0 (Wada and Harada, 1969). Allophane content in the clay fraction was estimated from Si concentration (Sio) in acid oxalate extracts using the formula: allophanic clay % = 7.1 x Sio % (Parfitt, 1990).

Semiquantitative XRD methods were used to estimate the content of crystalline minerals in the clay fraction (Whitton and Churchman, 1987), except for total kaolin (halloysite and kaolinite) content, which was measured by DTA. Te Akatea halloysite (Churchman and Theng, 1984) and a well-crystalline kaolinite (Dana) similar to the KGa-1 reference material of the Clay Minerals Society (van Olphen and Fripiat, 1979, p. 13–15) were used as standards. Halloysite was distinguished from kaolinite by the presence of a peak near 1.0 nm before or after intercalation of formamide (Churchman and Theng, 1984; Churchman, 1990) and by calculating the ratio of the intensity of the 001 peaks (i.e., the sum of the intensity of the peak at 0.7 nm and that at 1.0–1.1 nm). We used the differential response of K+- and Mg2+-saturated clays to ethylene glycol to search for evidence of halloysite–smectite mixed-layer clays as described by Delvaux et al. (1990b). Diffractograms for the treatments described above were performed using Co K{alpha} radiation generated with a Philips PW 1710 instrument (Philips Analytical, Eindhoven, the Netherlands) operating at 40 kV and 60 mA; the scanning rate was 2° 2{theta} min-1.

In addition, the fine clay (<0.2 µm), coarse clay (0.2–2 µm), silt (2–50 µm), and fine sand (50–250 µm) fractions from the 2Bt3 horizons were isolated for XRD analysis using the methods of Jackson (1975). The bulk soil was treated with H2O2/citrate-dithionite and dispersion by ultrasonic vibration at 20 kHz for 5 min before particle-size fractionation. X-ray diffraction was performed on oriented samples for the clay and silt fractions and on random powder mounts for the sand fraction. All samples were saturated with K+ (then heated to 25, 300, and 550°C) and Mg2+ (nontreated and solvated with glycerol and formamide) for XRD analysis. The latter diffractograms were obtained with a Diano 8000 x-ray diffractometer (Diano Corp., Woburn, MA) using Cu K{alpha} radiation generated with 50 kV accelerating potential and 15 mA tube current. Samples were step-scanned for 2 s at a 0.04° 2{theta} step. Throughout the manuscript we will use the following definitions for the various kaolin minerals:

  1. "(1.0 nm) halloysite" for hydrated halloysite
  2. "(0.7 nm) halloysite" for dehydrated halloysite that is expandable by formamide
  3. "tubular kaolinite" (Churchman and Gilkes, 1989) for material with a tubular particle morphology and 0.7-nm basal reflection that does not expand with formamide.

Transmission electron microscopy was performed on clay specimens spotted onto C-coated collodion films. Total elemental analysis was performed by fusion with lithium metaborate, dissolution in nitric acid, and quantification by inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy (Ingamells, 1970). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was used to determine elemental concentrations in the surface layers of halloysite particles (Soma et al., 1992). Halloysite disorder and tetrahedral Al concentration were assessed by medium-field 27Al-NMR spectroscopy as described by Newman et al. (1994). Specific surface area (total surface area) was measured on Ca2+–saturated clays by adsorption of para-nitrophenol (Theng, 1995).

A K+–Ca2+ exchange equilibrium study was performed using the methods of Wada and Odahara (1993) on nontreated, bulk soil samples (<2 mm) and on the H2O2/citrate-dithionite treated, clay fraction (<2 µm) from the 2Bt3 horizons. Exchange equilibrium values were measured across a range of K adsorption ratios ([K+]/[Ca2+]1/2) from 0.1 to 4.5 mM1/2 (final values after equilibrium). Samples were washed five times with 0.5 M CaCl2 to saturate exchange sites with Ca2+, then washed six times to equilibrate the exchange sites with mixed KCl–CaCl2 solutions having a constant 0.02 M Cl concentration. After the final decantation, adsorbed K+ and Ca2+ were extracted five times using 1 M NH4OAc solution. Concentrations of K+ and Ca2+ in the equilibrium solution and exchangeable-cation extracts were measured by atomic absorption–flame emission spectroscopy. Chloride was measured in the exchangeable-cation extracts using the mercury thiocyanate method (Frankenberger et al., 1996) to determine whether whole salt (KCl) retention contributed to CEC values. The Gapon (KG) and Vanselow (KV) selectivity coefficients were calculated using the equations

(1)

(2)
where EK and ECa denote equivalent fractions of adsorbed K+ and Ca2+, NK and NCa denote molar fractions of adsorbed K+ and Ca2+, and (Ca2+) and (K+) denote aqueous ion activities. Aqueous ion activities were calculated using activity coefficients computed from the Davies equation. The overall selectivity values expressed in this study bear the dimensions of (L mol-1)-1/2 for KG and L mol-1 for KV.

Cation-exchange capacity originating from clinoptilolite and non-zeolitic materials was estimated by the method of Ming and Dixon (1987) using bulk soil samples (<2 mm) from the halloysite-rich horizons after treatment with H2O2 and citrate-dithionite. We substituted 0.5 M tetramethyl-ammonium chloride for the tert-butylammonium chloride used by Ming and Dixon (1987). The amount of variable and permanent charge on the <2-mm fraction from selected horizons, after treatment with H2O2/citrate-dithionite, was estimated using the cesium-adsorption method of Anderson and Sposito (1991).


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Clay Mineralogy
The clay-size fraction (<2 µm) of both pedons is dominated by kaolin and allophanic clays (Fig. 1 and Table 2). Allophanic clays are prevalent (9–21%) in the upper 50 cm of both pedons and occur at very low concentrations in the lower horizons (Table 2). The allophanic materials have an Al/Si atomic ratio of {approx}2.0 and a thread-like morphology characteristic of imogolite (Takahashi et al., 1993). The enrichment of allophanic materials in the surface horizons correlates well with the concentrations of volcanic glass in the fine-sand fraction (Takahashi et al., 1993). Thus, the distribution of allophanic clays appears to be related to the recent additions of rhyolitic ash whose volcanic glass component rapidly weathers to allophanic clays. In the lower horizons, 75 to 91% (estimated by DTA) of the clay-size fraction is composed of kaolin minerals (kaolinite and halloysite). Only trace quantities of 2:1 type layer silicates and gibbsite are present in the lower soil horizons.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. X-ray diffractograms (Co K{alpha} radiation) of H2O2/citrate-dithionite treated clay (<2 µm) samples. Mg = Mg-saturated; Mg-F = Mg-saturated, formamide solvated

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Semiquantitative mineralogical analysis of the clay-size (<2 µm) fraction of the Red Tank and LeTrab pedons.{dagger}

 
Halloysite (expandable to 1.0 nm with or without formamide) and kaolinite concentrations show an inverse relationship with depth, the content of halloysite (0.7 plus 1.0 nm) increasing down the profile. Transmission electron microscopy indicates a predominance of particles with tubular morphology for both the kaolinite-dominated surface horizons and the halloysite-dominated subsurface horizons (Fig. 2) . We ascribe these findings to profile desiccation in the summer, which causes (1.0 nm) halloysite in the upper soil horizons to convert to a 1:1 type clay mineral of 0.7-nm basal spacing (tubular kaolinite) that does not expand with formamide (Takahashi et al., 1993). Repeated cycles of desiccation may also contribute to the transformation of amorphous weathering products to more ordered kaolin minerals in the upper soil horizons (Fieldes, 1966). The inverse relationship between (0.7/1.0 nm) halloysite and kaolinite has been previously observed in regions with a pronounced dry season (Miehlich, 1984; Churchman and Gilkes, 1989; Southard and Southard, 1987). Churchman and Gilkes (1989) have explained this observation in terms of the transformation of halloysite (1.0 nm) to tubular kaolinite via a dehydrated halloysite (0.7 nm) phase that is expandable by formamide.



View larger version (180K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Transmission electron micrograph of the clay-size (<2 µm) fraction of the LeTrab 2Bt3 horizon. Reference scale is 0.5 µm

 
The fine clay (<0.2 µm), coarse clay (0.2–2 µm), silt (2–50 µm), and fine sand (50–250 µm) fractions of the 2Bt3 horizon of each soil were more thoroughly investigated because this horizon displayed the greatest K+ selectivity. The XRD analysis revealed that kaolin minerals (Fig. 3) dominated all particle-size fractions. K+-saturation and heating to 300°C resulted in a collapse of the 1.0-nm peak to 0.7 nm with a slight tailing to higher d-spacings. Further heating to 550°C led to the disappearance of the 0.7-nm peak with no residual peaks in the 1.0 to 1.4 nm region. Treatment of the Mg2+-saturated slide with glycerol resulted in a flattening and broadening of the 1.0-nm peak toward smaller angles. In some cases (e.g., Le Trab <0.2 µm), a distinct reflection centered near 1.1 nm forms, which is consistent with the presence of halloysite (Whittig and Allardice, 1986). Other patterns show flattening of the 1.0-nm peak with no distinct reflection. This could be an indication that some expanding clays occur and that their layers have different charge densities. Treatment of the Mg2+-saturated slide with formamide generally enhanced the 1.0-nm peak at the expense of the 0.7-nm peak, suggesting a combination of hydrated (1.0 nm) and dehydrated (0.7 nm) halloysite in all fractions. Trace concentrations of a 1.4-nm mineral can be observed in the silt fraction of each soil. Due to its low content, however, it is very difficult to establish whether this 1.4-nm peak expands with glycerol solvation. In the upper soil horizons that contained material with a distinct 1.4-nm peak (Fig. 1), the 2:1 layer silicate was presumed to be vermiculite because it did not expand with glycerol solvation.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. X-ray diffractograms (Cu K{alpha} radiation) for the fine clay (<0.2 µm), coarse clay (0.2–2 µm), silt (2–50 µm), and fine-sand (50–250 µm) fractions from the 2Bt3 horizons. Mg = Mg-saturated; Mg-G = Mg-saturated, glycerol solvated; Mg-F = Mg-saturated, formamide solvated; K-25/300/550 = K-saturated with heating to 25, 300, and 550°C. Samples were pretreated with H2O2 to remove organic matter, and citrate-dithionite to remove free Fe oxides before dispersion and particle-size fractionation

 
These data on the contrasting particle-size fractions provide two important pieces of information. First, layer silicate clays in the silt and sand fractions contribute appreciably to the CEC of the bulk soil (<2-mm fraction). Sand-sized halloysite has been previously reported in the fine sand fractions of soils formed from basalt under high rainfall in Australia (Simonett and Bauleke, 1963) and from andesitic volcanics in the xeric moisture regime of California (Southard and Southard, 1987). The latter researchers obtained scanning electron micrographs showing pseudomorphic replacement of feldspar by halloysite. Secondly, some 2:1 layer silicates are present, and they appear to be most prevalent in the silt-size fraction. While the concentration of poorly ordered 2:1 layer silicates appears to be low in the clay-size fractions, the existence of these minerals cannot be ruled out because their presence is difficult to demonstrate by XRD.

Elemental Analysis of Clay-Size (<2 µm) Fraction
Total elemental analysis of the deferrated, Na-saturated clay fraction (<2 µm) shows a Si/Al atomic ratio of nearly 1.0 for the lower soil horizons, consistent with the dominance of kaolin minerals (Table 3). The Red Tank 2Bt3 is the only horizon having a Si/Al atomic ratio greater than 1.0 because of the presence of some quartz (Table 2). Thus, the elemental analysis supports the finding by semiquantitative mineralogy (Table 2) that 2:1 type layer silicate concentrations are low. Furthermore, the low K concentration (0.08–0.15% K2O) in the lower two horizons indicates that micaceous minerals are virtually absent. Iron and Mg concentrations are similarly low in the halloysite-dominated lower horizons (0.94–1.32% Fe2O3 and 0.06–0.15% MgO), indicating that they are only a minor structural component of the clay minerals. The XPS analysis of clays from the Red Tank 2Bt3 horizon (Table 4) shows an Al/Si ratio of 1.0 and a Fe/Si ratio of 0.02 in the surface layers, which are similar to the values derived from elemental composition of the bulk clay. However, because of the uncertainty in the quantitative XPS analysis, the existence of 1:1–2:1 mixed layer minerals cannot be determined by XPS unless the observed octahedral cation/Si ratio is less than 0.9.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Total elemental analysis of the clay-size (<2 µm) fraction following organic matter removal with H2O2 and free Fe oxide removal with citrate-dithionite. Clays were Na saturated and dialyzed before analysis

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Results of x-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) analysis for the Na-saturated, clay-size (<2 µm) fraction of the Red Tank 2Bt3 horizon. Clays were isolated following organic matter removal with H2O2 and free Fe oxides removal with citrate-dithionite

 
Potassium Ion Selectivity of Bulk Soils (<2 mm) and Selected Clay-Size (<2 µm) Fractions
Equilibrium pH values and the amount of adsorbed cationic charge (Ca2+ + K+) for bulk soil and selected clays in the K+–Ca2+ exchange equilibrium study are listed in Table 5. The pH values were >6, suggesting that exchangeable Al ions were insignificant and Ca2+–K+ binary exchange was not affected by Al ions. The variation in the sum of exchangeable Ca2+ + K+ was small for all the samples. This indicates that the preferential adsorption of the monovalent CaCl+ cation, reported by Sposito et al. (1983), was negligible. It also indicates that K+ fixation is not an important factor and provides further support for low concentrations of micaceous minerals (Carson and Dixon, 1972). Concentrations of Cl- in the 1 M NH4OAc extracting solutions were <0.5 cmolckg-1, indicating minimal retention of whole salt (KCl) by halloysite in this study (Wada, 1958).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Mean and standard deviation (SD) for equilibrium pH and adsorbed (K + Ca) in Ca2+–K+ exchange equilibrium study. Values are for the bulk soil (<2 mm) and the clay fraction from the 2Bt3 horizons following organic matter removal with H2O2 and free Fe oxides with citrate-dithionite

 
Plots of adsorbed vs. solution K+ along with the nonpreference isotherm and Vanselow (KV) and Gapon (KG) selectivity coefficients vs. K+ saturation are shown in Fig. 4 and 5 . These data clearly demonstrate the high K+ selectivity displayed by these soils. In both pedons, K+ selectivity is lowest in the surface horizons and increases with depth. This pattern of K+ selectivity shows an inverse relationship to the distribution of vermiculite and increases as the concentration of 0.7-nm and 1.0-nm halloysites in the clay-size fraction increases (Fig. 1 and Table 2). The lower K+ selectivity in surface horizons is partially attributable to their relatively higher concentration of organic matter (Table 1), which has a low affinity for K+ compared with Ca2+ (Schnitzer and Khan, 1972). The bulk soil (<2 mm) from the lower three horizons of each pedon, dominated by 0.7-nm and 1.0-nm halloysites, has a low organic C concentration (<7 g kg-1) and a high K+ selectivity. The trend of increasing K+ selectivity with depth (Fig. 5) parallels the increase in halloysite (0.7 and 1.0 nm) concentration and the greater degree of halloysite hydration (Table 2 and Fig. 1).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Adsorbed K+ (EK) vs. solution K+ compared to the nonpreference line for Ca2+–K+ exchange. Data are for the <2-mm fraction (filled circle) of the nontreated soil and for the 2Bt3 clay fraction (open triangle) that was treated with H2O2 to remove organic matter and citrate-dithionite to remove free Fe oxides before dispersion and particle-size fractionation. Nonpreference line (dashed line) calculated following Sposito et al. (1983) (i.e., KV = 1; see Eq. [2])

 


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Gapon selectivity coefficient (KG) (upper panels) and natural logarithm of the Vanselow selectivity coefficient (ln Kv) (lower panels) as a function of the equivalent adsorbed fraction of K (EK). Data are for the <2-mm fraction (filled circle) of the nontreated soil, and for the 2Bt3 clay fraction (triangle) that was treated with H2O2 to remove organic matter and citrate-dithionite to remove free Fe oxides before dispersion and particle-size fractionation

 
Exchange equilibrium measurements were also determined for the clay-size fraction (<2 µm, H2O2/citrate-dithionite treated) from the 2Bt3 horizons. The amount of adsorbed Ca2+ + K+ was only {approx}3 cmolc kg-1 greater for the clay-size fraction than for the <2-mm soil fraction (Table 5). This unexpectedly small difference is attributable to the high contents of layer silicate clays in the silt and sand fractions (Fig. 3). The clay-size fraction showed appreciably less K+ selectively than the <2-mm bulk soil from the same horizon (Fig. 4 and 5). These contrasting results suggest that components removed by H2O2 and/or citrate-dithionite treatment, and/or components contained in the silt and sands fractions have a major influence on K+ selectivity.

Cation-Exchange Capacity and Surface Area of Clay-Size Fractions
The CEC (CaOAc, pH 7.0) of the organic matter-free, deferrated clay-size fraction ranges from 19 to 37 cmolc kg-1 (Table 6). The lower soil horizons dominated by halloysite show CEC values from 19 to 26 cmolc kg-1, which are very high for halloysite. The CEC values for kaolin minerals generally range between 2 and 10 cmolc kg-1, although Bailey (1990) reported values as high as 60 cmolc kg-1 for halloysite-rich clays in a review of the literature. These uncommonly high CEC values may be due to contamination by 2:1 layer silicates (Lim et al., 1980). However, Norrish (1995) described a hydrated halloysite with high CEC (20 cmolc kg-1 clay) and no real evidence of 2:1 contaminants. This halloysite occurred as long laths (up to 20 µm), had a high surface area, and lost one-half of its CEC upon field drying.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Cation-exchange capacity (CEC) and surface area of the clay-size (<2 µm) fraction following organic matter removal with H2O2 and free Fe oxides with citrate-dithionite

 
The surface areas of the clay-size fraction from the halloysite-dominated lower horizons, measured by adsorption of para-nitrophenol, range between 78 and 112 m2 g-1 (Table 6). It is difficult to compare these values with those reported in the literature because the methods of measurement were different. Theng (1995) reported surface areas by para-nitrophenol of 30 to 110 m2 g-1 for a range of halloysites and 10 to 25 m2 g-1 for a range of kaolinite minerals. The specific surface areas of halloysites determined by a variety of methods are generally <50 m2 g-1, although values as high as 110 m2 g-1 have been reported (Dixon, 1989; Delvaux et al., 1990a; Theng, 1995). Thus, the kaolin minerals in this study appear to have high surface areas relative to many kaolin minerals reported in the literature.

Possible Mechanisms for High Cation-Exchange Capacity and K+ Selectivity
Only a few instances of high K+/NH4+ selectivity in soils dominated by halloysite have previously been reported (Okamura and Wada, 1984; Fontaine et al., 1989; Delvaux et al., 1989, 1990a, 1990b). We tested four hypotheses that could possibly explain the exceptionally high values of K+ selectivity, CEC, and surface area of our samples:

  1. the presence of halloysite–smectite mixed-layer clays
  2. the presence of 2:1 layer silicate contaminants
  3. the presence of trace concentrations of zeolites (e.g., clinoptilolite)
  4. the existence of a high-charge halloysite with a strong affinity for K+

Halloysite–smectite mixed-layer clays have been shown to contribute to the high CEC and K+ selectivity of soils derived from basaltic volcanic ash, primarily in tropical and subtropical areas (Quantin et al., 1988; Delvaux et al., 1990b, 1992; Delvaux and Herbillon, 1995). Halloysite-smectite mixed-layer clays form in silica- and base-rich environments at the expense of primary minerals through syngenetic formation, which is microenvironment dependent (Delvaux and Herbillon, 1995). The existence of such a halloysite–smectite mixed-layer clay was inferred from several analytical techniques, including differences in XRD patterns between K+- and Mg2+-saturated clays following ethylene glycol treatment (Delvaux et al., 1990b, 1992; Delvaux and Herbillon, 1995). In the case of the Mg2+-saturated clay, the 1.0-nm reflection is shifted to 1.05 nm and exhibits a distinct broadening towards low diffraction angles; simultaneously, a weak peak appears at 1.49 nm that cannot be assigned to halloysite. In contrast, there is no detectable shift for the K+-saturated sample. This differential response to ethylene glycol treatment provides strong evidence for the existence of mixed layer clays.

We followed this procedure for our clay (<2 µm) and silt (2–50 µm) fractions. The XRD patterns for the K+- and Mg2+-saturated samples solvated with ethylene glycol were nearly indistinguishable (Fig. 6) . However, ethylene glycol treatment tends to cause broadening of the 1.0-nm reflection towards low angles for both K+- and Mg2+-saturated samples, possibly due to the expansion of a poorly ordered 2:1 layer silicate. Otherwise, there was no detectable shift of the 1.0-nm peak for either the K+- or the Mg2+-saturated samples, nor did we observe a 1.49-nm reflection. Although the existence of 1:1–2:1 mixed-layer clays cannot be ruled out, the data suggest that mixed layer clays, if present, occur in low concentrations and/or that they do not contain smectitic layers. The 1.4-nm peak observed in the silt-size fraction indicates the presence of a vermiculitic mineral. This peak was not observed in the clay-size fraction. However, a broad diffraction band in the 10 to 7° (2{theta}) region following heating to 550°C may indicate the presence of some 2:1 layers in the clay fractions.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. X-ray diffractograms (Co K{alpha} radiation) of Red Tank 2Bt3 and LeTrab 2Bt3 clay (<2 µm) (lower diffractograms) and silt (2–50 µm) (upper diffractograms) fractions. Mg = Mg-saturated; Mg-EG = Mg-saturated, ethylene glycol vapor treated; K-EG = K-saturated, ethylene glycol vapor treated; K-550 = K-saturated with heating to 550°C

 
The presence of small amounts of mica or vermiculite has also been invoked to explain the high K+ selectivity of certain soils dominated by halloysite (Parfitt, 1992). Data from the halloysite-rich lower horizons of our soils suggest the virtual absence of 2:1 layer silicates in the clay-size fraction (<2 µm). The semiquantitative XRD data (Table 2), detailed XRD analysis of the fine (<0.2 µm) and coarse (0.2–2 µm) clay fractions (Fig. 3), XPS surface chemical analysis (Table 4), the Si/Al atomic ratio, and total K concentration of the clay fraction (Table 3) all suggest that the clay fraction is dominated by kaolin minerals. However, XRD analysis of the silt-size (2–50 µm) fraction indicates minor concentrations of 2:1 layer silicates (Fig. 3 and 6), but their contribution to the high CEC and K+ selectivity of the bulk soil (<2 mm) is difficult to ascertain. Assuming a CEC of 100 to 200 cmolc kg-1 for a 2:1 layer silicate, {approx}10 to 20 wt. % of such a mineral would be required in the clay fraction to provide the 19 to 26 cmolc kg-1 of CEC determined for the clay-size fraction. Previous studies have shown that K+ selectivity and relative halloysite content in kaolin minerals both increase as particle size decreases (Delvaux et al., 1989, 1990a, 1992). Here, the effect of the particle size was only documented in the two 2Bt3 horizons where it is just the opposite: K+ selectivity decreases as particle size decreases, just as it occurs if K+ selectivity is ruled out by discrete 2:1 minerals in the clay-size fraction (Carson and Dixon, 1972). However, the effects of particle size cannot be unambiguously separated from the effects of Fe removal by citrate-dithionite treatment in this study.

The bulk soil (<2 mm) had a greater K+ selectivity than the deferrated clay fraction (<2 µm), thus the trace quantities of 2:1 layer silicates must contribute in part to the high CEC and K+ selectivity. Although XRD analysis of random powder mounts did not show 2:1 layer silicates in the fine sand fraction (50–250 µm), it is possible that these constituents may be present in the sand fraction. Delvaux and Herbillon (1995) provided evidence to indicate that smectite preferably forms within the clast substrate, whereas halloysite forms in the microenvironments subject to greater leaching. Similarly, Jongmans et al. (1999) showed the presence of halloysite and smectite in pseudomorphs after pyroxenes in andesitic pyroclasts. They showed spherical halloysite transitioning to smectite when moving from the outer margin to the center of the pyroxene crystal. These weathering patterns would result in halloysitic clays dominating the clay-size fraction, and 2:1 layer silicates the coarser-size fractions.

We also investigated the possibility that trace concentrations of zeolites may contribute to the unusual charge characteristics of our soils. Clinoptilolite, for example, commonly occurs in soils derived from hydrothermally altered volcanic parent material (Boettinger and Graham, 1995). This zeolite has a strong affinity for K+, a high CEC (220 cmolc kg-1), and a very high specific surface area (Ming and Mumpton, 1989). However, XRD analysis of the clay, silt, and fine-sand fractions from the soils used here showed no evidence for the occurrence of zeolites (detection limits of {approx}3 wt. %). Following Ming and Dixon (1987), we used a CEC method based on ion-sieving properties in an attempt to quantify clinoptilolite concentrations in the deferrated bulk soil samples (<2 mm) of the 2Bt3 horizons. However, the zeolitic CEC value could account for no more than 15% of the soil's CEC (Table 7), corresponding with a clinoptilolite concentration of 1 to 2 wt. %, which is close to the detection limit of this method (Ming and Dixon, 1987). The apparent absence or low abundance of zeolites in these pedons is not surprising because these minerals are sensitive to chemical weathering (Ming and Mumpton, 1989). Thus, we conclude that zeolites do not contribute significantly (<15%) to the high CEC values of these soils.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. Cation-exchange capacity (CEC) derived from non-zeolitic and zeolitic exchange sites for H2O2 and citrate-dithionite treated soil samples (<2 mm)

 
The existence of a high-charge halloysite with a strong affinity for K+ (or NH+4) has been suggested (but not confirmed) to explain the unusual charge characteristics of some soils dominated by halloysite (Wada and Odahara, 1993; Okamura and Wada, 1984). The permanent negative charge in halloysite may originate from isomorphous substitution of Al3+ for Si4+ in the tetrahedral sheet as suggested by Bailey (1990), from nonstoichiometric substitution of Fe3+ for Al3+ in the octahedral sheet (Soma et al., 1992; Newman et al., 1994), or from Al vacancies in the octahedral sheet (Soma et al., 1992; Newman et al., 1994). Wada and Mizota (1982) reported on a halloysite with a large amount of Fe (12.8% Fe2O3) and a high CEC (58.1 cmolc kg-1); however, the XRD patterns indicated that the sample was not pure halloysite. The Fe contents of the halloysite–smectite mixed layer clays reported by Delvaux et al. (1990b) were also high (4.0–7.3% Fe2O3). In this study, the Fe concentration in the deferrated clay fraction of the halloysite-dominated horizons was low, as indicated by total elemental analysis (0.9–1.6% Fe2O3) and XPS spectroscopy. We conclude that Fe-rich halloysite is not present; however, a low-Fe halloysite with nonstoichiometric substitution of Fe3+ for Al3+ and/or Al vacancies in the octahedral sheet may contribute to the unusual charge characteristics of our soils.

Figure 7 shows the 27Al-NMR spectrum of the halloysite-rich clay from the Red Tank 2Bt3 horizon. For comparison, we have included the spectra of the most ordered halloysite (Matauri Bay) and one of the least ordered halloysites (Te Akatea) from the study of Newman et al. (1994). The spectrum of the Red Tank 2Bt3 clay is dominated by a signal at a chemical shift ({delta}) of -9 ppm, assigned to octahedral Al. The peak has an asymmetric line shape with a low-frequency tail, indicating that the halloysite has a very high degree of structural disorder, presumably arising from Al-vacancy displacements in the octahedral sheet (Newman et al., 1994). A weak, broad peak at {delta} = 56 ppm is due to tetrahedral Al, which accounts for {approx}2% of the Al in the sample. If all of the four-coordinate Al is assigned to the tetrahedral sheet, {approx}50% of the measured CEC can be accounted for by isomorphous substitution of Al3+ for Si4+. However, some or all of the Al(IV) signal in our sample may originate from small amounts of impurities, such as those previously identified in halloysite samples by Churchman and Theng (1984). The remainder of the charge may originate from Al vacancies in the octahedral sheet.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Aluminum-27 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrum of Red Tank 2Bt3 clay. Soil was treated with H2O2 to remove organic matter and citrate-dithionite to remove free Fe oxides before dispersion and particle-size fractionation. The spectra of a well-ordered halloysite (Matauri Bay) and a poorly ordered halloysite (Te Akatea), as reported by Newman et al. (1994), are included for reference. {delta} = chemical shift measured relative to the signal from 0.1 M aluminum sulfate

 
We examined the distribution of the variable and permanent charge in the Red Tank 2Bt3 and LeTrab 2Bt3 soil samples (<2 mm), after treatment with H2O2 and CBD, using the method of Anderson and Sposito (1991). For both horizons the magnitude of the permanent charge ({approx}20 cmolc kg-1) is nearly twice that of the variable charge component (Table 8). The permanent charge may result from a combination of Al vacancies in the octahedral sheet, and isomorphous substitution of Al3+ for Si4+ in the tetrahedral sheet of halloysite. However, because we could detect some 2:1 layer silicates in the silt-size fraction, not all of the permanent charge can be assigned to halloysite.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 8. Variable and permanent charge of H2O2 and citrate-dithionite treated soil samples (<2 mm)

 
The magnitude of the variable charge ({approx}11 cmolc kg-1) is also unusual for 1:1 clay minerals, except if they have a small particle size (Delvaux et al., 1992). The variable charge is presumably due to (OH)Al(H2O) groups exposed at particle edges. Therefore, the magnitude of the variable charge is related to the surface area of edges, and the ratio of variable charge to total charge would reflect the edge/total surface area ratio. This high variable charge is consistent with the short lath-shape halloysite particles (Fig. 2), which have a high surface area associated with edges (Theng et al., 1982). The clay-size fraction (<2 µm) also has a large component of fine clays (<0.2 µm) (Red Tank 40%, LeTrab 47%), which contributes to a high edge/total surface area ratio.

The relatively high concentrations of free Fe oxides (27–101 g kg-1) in the form of surface coatings (giving rise to soil colors of 7.5YR 4/6) may also contribute to some K+ selectivity relative to Ca2+. Escudey and Galindo (1988) have shown that clays with Fe oxides exhibit a higher preference for K+ than their counterparts that had been treated with citrate-bicarbonate-dithionite. With an isoelectric point >=8.7, Fe oxides have a net positive surface charge at the equilibrium pH of our soils (pH 6–7; Tables 1 and 5). Charge-to-charge repulsion would make access of divalent cations (i.e., Ca2+) to the internal negative surface exchange sites more difficult than that of monovalent cations (K+). In our study, the deferrated clay-size fraction showed a much lower K+ selectivity compared with the nontreated bulk soil (<2 mm). This may be explained in terms of the removal of Fe oxide coatings, the preferential accumulation of 2:1 layer silicates in the silt and sand fractions, and/or modification of mineral charge properties after reduction with dithionite.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Although numerous analytical methods were applied to characterize these halloysite-rich soils, it has not been possible to offer an unambiguous explanation for the high CEC and K+ selectivity of these soils. Though the existence of 1:1–2:1 mixed-layer clays was not evident from our analytical data, genuine 2:1 layer silicates were detected by XRD, especially in the silt- and sand-size fractions. This led us to suggest that the high CEC and K+ selectivity displayed by the soils cannot be attributed unequivocally to the charge characteristics of the poorly ordered halloysite that dominates the clay fraction, even though this clay species may represent up to 90 wt. % of the clay fraction. For the 2Bt3 horizons, K+ selectivity was appreciably higher in the nontreated, bulk soil (<2 mm) as compared with the deferrated clay-size (<2 µm) fraction. It seems probable, therefore, that Fe oxide surface coatings and/or the presence of appreciable 2:1 layer silicates in the silt and sand fractions may contribute to the K+ selectivity in these soils. Because basaltic rocks are low in K, this characteristic plays an important role in enhancing K availability and attenuating K losses by leaching.

Received for publication April 12, 1999.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
C. Rasmussen, N. Matsuyama, R. A. Dahlgren, R. J. Southard, and N. Brauer
Soil Genesis and Mineral Transformation Across an Environmental Gradient on Andesitic Lahar
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2007; 71(1): 225 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clays and Clay MineralsHome page
E. Joussein, S. Petit, C.-I. Fialips, P. Vieillard, and D. Righi
DIFFERENCES IN THE DEHYDRATION-REHYDRATION BEHAVIOR OF HALLOYSITES: NEW EVIDENCE AND INTERPRETATIONS
Clays and Clay Minerals, August 1, 2006; 54(4): 473 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clay MineralsHome page
E. JOUSSEIN, S. PETIT, J. CHURCHMAN, B. THENG, D. RIGHI, and B. DELVAUX
Halloysite clay minerals -- a review
Clay Minerals, December 1, 2005; 40(4): 383 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
E. Joussein, N. Kruyts, D. Righi, S. Petit, and B. Delvaux
Specific Retention of Radiocesium in Volcanic Ash Soils Devoid of Micaceous Clay Minerals
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2004; 68(1): 313 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow