|
|
||||||||
a Dep. of Environmental and Resource Sciences, MS 370, Univ. of Nevada-Reno, Reno, NV 89557
b Dep. of Soil Science, Institute of Ecology, Berlin Univ. of Technology, Salzufer 11-12, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
c Institute of Soil Science and Soil Geography, Univ. of Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany
d EMBRAPA-Cerrados, Caixa Postal 08223, Planaltina-DF, Brazil
e CIAT-LADERAS, Apartado 1410, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
f Federal Univ. of Uberlândia, 38406-210 Uberlândia-MG, Brazil
* Corresponding author (wolfgang.wilcke{at}tu-berlin.de)
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abbreviations: CE, Cerrado DP, degraded pasture ECEC, effective cation-exchange capacity HSD, honest significant difference PP, productive pasture TOC, total organic C
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The productivity of pastures may be measured as the dry matter production of the grass species at locations protected from grazing or as the liveweight gains of the cattle. Biomass production of fertilized Brachiaria decumbens Stapf pastures in the Brazilian CE ranges between 5.5 and 11 Mg ha-1 yr-1 and liveweight gains between 487 and 771 kg ha-1 at stocking rates of 2 to 2.5 animal units ha-1 (Kornelius et al., 1979; Cadisch et al., 1994). The grass biomass productivity of Brachiaria pastures in Brazil is substantially lower than in Australia where it may reach 33 Mg ha-1 yr-1 (Whiteman et al., 1980). Furthermore, if the soils are not regularly fertilized the productivity declines rapidly after 4 to 10 yr (Boddey et al., 1996).
The effects of forest clearing and subsequent pasture use on the fertility of the CE Oxisols has up to now only been studied by a few researchers (Lilienfein et al., 1998, 1999, 2000b; Neufeldt, 1998; Resck et al., 2000). Lilienfein et al. (1998)(2000b) found no significant differences in water-stable aggregate distribution and concentrations of total C, N, P, S, and Mo between the topsoils under native CE vegetation and pasture near the city of Uberlândia in the State of Minas Gerais. The distribution of P, S, and Mo among different chemical fractions did not differ between pasture soils and soils under native CE. From the same study area, Neufeldt (1998) reported a strong increase in soil organic C concentrations in pasture soils compared with the soils under native CE, particularly in the 50- to 2000-µm particle-size fraction. Spain et al. (1996) found increased N concentrations under pasture than under native CE. The temporal course of the matric potentials as a measure for plant-available water and the mean water storage in soil under nonfertilized DP and under PP, which received maintenance fertilization were close to those of soils under native CE (Lilienfein et al., 1999).
For the Amazonian region, which has different climate but similar soils, more studies on the effect of pasture use on soil properties have been published. Cerri et al. (1991) and Feigl et al. (1995) observed decreasing C concentrations in surface soil after forest clearing in central Amazonas and Rondônia, respectively, which increased again after 1 to 2 yr of pasture use, while Eden et al. (1991) did not observe a significant change in C concentrations in northern Roraima over time. Some authors reported increased C and N storage in surface soils after several years of pasture use compared with natural forest in eastern Amazonas and Rondônia (Feigl et al., 1995; Koutika et al., 1997). In the upper 1 m of an Oxisol under DP in Pará, Nepstad et al. (1994), in contrast, found reduced C storage compared with native rain forest. In the study of Eden et al. (1991), basic cation concentrations in pasture surface soils fell below those of the natural forest soils after 12 yr of pasture use. Nepstad et al. (1994) have shown that a large part of the Amazonian rain forest relies on deep roots (>8 m) for water uptake during droughts. Changing the rooting depth by replacing the forest with the less deeply rooting pastures would reduce the deep soil C storage and alter the soil-water cycle. The effect would be more pronounced for productive pure grass pastures than for the so-called DPs containing some woody plants because of decreasing rooting depth in the order, forest > DP > pure grass pasture. These results illustrate that pasture use of tropical Oxisols may have contrasting effects on soil properties and that we are far from being able to draw generalized conclusions concerning the biophysical sustainability of pastures in the CE region.
Previous studies concerning land-use effects on the nutrient status of Oxisols in the CE showed that soil solution responds more sensitively to land use than the soil solid phase. The concentrations and chemical forms of P, S, Mo, and metals in soil solid phase under natural savanna vegetation, Pinus plantation, and pastures were little affected by 10 to 20 yr of land use (Lilienfein et al., 2000a, 2000b, 2001a). Metal concentrations in soil solution under Pinus plantations, however, were significantly increased indicating the beginning of soil acidification (Lilienfein et al., 2000a). Furthermore, dissolved N concentrations in soil solution under Pinus were significantly higher than under CE because of the accumulation of a deep organic layer with a high N storage (Lilienfein et al., 2001a). In the present study we examined soil solution properties under pastures because we believe that they are a sensitive indicator of land-use effects on soil fertility.
Our objective was to evaluate the productivity and soil fertility as indicators for biophysical sustainability of the pastures in the CE region near the city of Uberlândia in an on-farm experiment. We chose the two major pasture types of the region: a pure grass PP receiving regular maintenance fertilizing and a so-called DP, which was only fertilized at the date of establishment and is now characterized by partly vegetation-free soil and invasive CE plants. The biophysical sustainability of the pastures was assessed by examining (i) the biomass productivity, (ii) the fertility, that is, the nutrient concentrations in soil solid phase and solution, and (iii) the risk of nutrient losses to the deeper subsoil as indicated by the depth distribution and the temporal course of nutrient concentrations in soil solution at various depths. We assumed that the native savanna ecosystem is sustainable with respect to nutrient cycles and therefore compared the nutrient status and dynamics of the pasture soils with that of soils under native CE.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Within an area of about 100 km2, three plots of natural savanna (CE), DP, and PP were selected (Fig. 1) . We tried to choose independent plots to allow for statistical evaluation with variance analysis (Lilienfein et al., 1999).
|
The most important criteria for the selection of the pasture plots were the current visual impression and the likelihood that the pasture use followed directly the clearing of the native vegetation. The DP sites showed the characteristics Lopes et al. (1999) described as typical for degraded pastures of the CE region: decreased grass cover compared with the PPs, followed by the invasion of CE plants. The PP, in contrast, was a pure grass pasture of Brachiaria decumbens Stapf with a closed vegetation cover. The history of the pastures was reconstructed by interviewing the current landowners. Because of changes in land ownership and the lack of written documentation, this reconstruction was not easy and may not be entirely reliable, although we only selected the pastures with the best-known history. However, we do not see how this problem may be overcome when attempting to conduct an on-farm study in a rapidly developing tropical country. All pastures under study were established by harvesting the native CE vegetation including the large roots. They were established around 1985. The most common procedure was to plant upland rice (Oryza sativa L.), which was fertilized with about 40 kg P, 65 kg K, 32 kg N, and 1 Mg of dolomitic limestone ha-1. The fertilizer was mixed with seeds of Brachiaria decumbens, an imported grass species from Africa. After the harvest of the rice, the Brachiaria was already stabilized and grazing began. In 1996-1997, we fertilized all PP replicates with 17 kg P ha-1 and 33 kg K ha-1. One of the three replicates of PP, PP1 in Fig. 1, was an experimental pasture where the fertilizing rates are well known. The pasture PP1 received 17 kg P and 33 kg K ha-1 at 4-yr intervals (i.e., in 1988, 1992, and 1996). The other PP replicates received maintenance fertilizer applications at similar but unknown rates and application dates. Soils at all sites were very-fine isohyperthermic Anionic Acrustoxes (Soil Survey Staff, 1997) or Latossolos vermelhos escuros and Latossolos vermelhos-amarelos according to the Brazilian soil classification and had similar chemical and physical properties before the beginning of land-use (Lilienfein et al., 1999). All soils were developed from the same geological parent material, fine limnic sediments of the lower Tertiary. The clay content of the soils ranged between 615 to 885 g kg-1. Properties, which are typically not influenced by land use such as soil classification, particle-size distribution, and the concentrations of dithionite-soluble Fe (Holmgren, 1967) and oxalate-soluble Al (Schwertmann, 1964) were not significantly different among the studied soils (Lilienfein et al., 1999).
Equipment and Sampling
On each of the nine plots, a 10 by 10 m area was fenced and equipped with five replicate tensiometers and suction cups at each of 0.15-, 0.3-, 0.8-, 1.2-, and 2-m soil depths. The major constituents of the porous cups were Al2O3 (70%) and SiO2 (29%) with a mean pore diameter of 1 µm. Soil solution samples were collected with permanent under-pressure produced by vacuum pumps. The under-pressure was adjusted weekly according to the current matric potentials measured with the tensiometers. The soil solutions collected with the five suction cups of a plot were combined into one sample for each depth. Soil solution was sampled and tensiometers were read weekly during two rainy seasons (14 Oct.28 Apr. 1997-1998 and 1998-1999).
At all nine plots, one composite soil sample from the 0- to 0.15-, 0.15- to 0.3-, 0.3- to 0.8-, 0.8- to 1.2-, 1.2- to 2-m layers was taken in January 1998. Within each plot, samples from the 0- to 0.15-m layer were taken from five locations and combined, while those of the deeper layers were taken from one soil pit on each plot. Soil bulk density was determined gravimetrically using 100-mL soil cores taken in five-fold replication per layer. All samples were dried at 40°C and sieved to <2 mm.
The pH of the soil solutions was measured in a subsample immediately after sampling with a standard pH electrode (U 402-S7, Orion, Boston, MA) in a separate aliquot, which was afterwards discarded. The remaining solutions were frozen for storage.
The following properties were determined in the solid soil samples: pH with a standard glass electrode in H2O and 1 M KCl, soil/solution ratio 1:2.5, total concentrations of C, N, and S by dry combustion and gas chromatographic separation with a CNS analyzer (Elementar Vario EL, Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Hanau, Germany), exchangeable cations by extraction with 1 M ammonium acetate (Sumner and Miller, 1996). The soil water content was estimated from the matric potentialsmeasured with tensiometerswith the help of the soil water characteristic curve as described by Lilienfein et al. (1999).
In soil solutions and extracts, we determined the concentrations of Ca, Fe, K, Mg, and Na with flame atomic absorption spectrometry (SpectrAA 400, Varian, Mulgrave, Australia). Aluminum, Mn, and Zn concentrations in soil solution were measured with inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (VG PlasmaQuad PQ2 Turbo Plus, VG Elemental, Windsford, UK) and in extracts with flame atomic absorption spectrometry, NH4 and NO3 with a rapid flow analyzer (RFA-300, Alpkem Corporation, Clackamas, OR), total organic C (TOC) with an automatic TOC analyzer (TOC-5050, Shimadzu Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), and total S and P with inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES, GBC Integra XMP, GBC Scientific Equipment Pty, Ltd., Dandenong, Victoria, Australia).
Grass Biomass Production
The grass biomass production of the pastures was determined by harvesting the total aboveground biomass of three replicate 0.5 m2 large subplots on six dates between 29 Oct. 1997 and 12 Apr. 1999 at all pasture plots. On each sampling date subplots were chosen for biomass determination. Biomass samples were collected at the beginning of the rainy season in October or November, in January or February, and at the end of the rainy season in April. After biomass sampling, all grass inside the fenced area was cut to the same mean height as outside to simulate grazing. The samples were dried to constant weight at 70°C and masses were determined gravimetrically. The productivity was calculated by difference of the aboveground biomass between two dates and addition of the biomass harvested per area of the subplot to simulate grazing.
Data Evaluation
To evaluate the effect of pasture management on nutrient availability to plants and nutrient leaching we compared the mean depth distribution and the temporal course of selected soil solution properties between CE, DP, and PP. The examined properties include the pH and the concentration of TOC (<80 µm, i.e., in the solution that passed the ceramic cups without further filtration). We consider solution TOC to be an index of dissolved and particulate organic matter, which may be important nutrient carriers (Kalbitz et al., 2000), as well as a source of nutrients and potentially toxic Al (Savory and Wills, 1991).
To enable data evaluation with the help of ANOVA we tested the three following prerequisites of the statistical design of our study. The first prerequisite is that all study sites had homogeneous soil properties before land use, which we showed above. The second prerequisite is that the study sites are independent. We are sure that this is the case because all study sites are separated from each other by areas with other land use and because the distance of several 100 m between the plots is larger than geostatistical ranges of the studied soil properties. The third prerequisite is random location within the homogeneous study area. This prerequisite was most difficult to meet because we had to use existing land-use systems in our on-farm experiment. Although we may not rule out that there were site-specific reasons for the establishment of a given land use, the homogeneity of the soil suggests that random ownership was more important than soil quality. Therefore, we concluded that the prerequisites for applying ANOVA were met.
Mean values of the soil parameters were tested for differences between CE, DP, and PP by using Tukey's honest significant difference (HSD) mean separation test (Hartung and Elpelt, 1989). To compare mean nutrient concentrations in the soil solution between the systems and between the various depths of one system, the Wilcoxon matched-pairs test was used. Significance was set at P < 0.05 for Tukey's HSD test and at P < 0.01 for the Wilcoxon matched-pairs test because of the high number of compared values. Correlation analyses between soil water content and nutrient concentrations in soil solution were performed using the Least Squares method (Hartung, 1989). Statistical analyses were performed with STATISTICA for Windows 5.1 (StatSoft, 1995, Loll and Nielsen, Hamburg, Germany).
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Soil Fertility: Soil Solid Phase Properties
Soil pH determines the plant-availability of many nutrients. In Oxisols, particularly the P availability is reduced because of strong sorption to oxides at pH < 5 (Goedert, 1983; Tiessen and Moir, 1993; Friesen et al., 1997). The pH of the study soils is controlled by the buffering of Al oxides, which is typical for Oxisols (Ulrich, 1981; Goedert, 1983; Driessen and Dudal, 1989; Table 1)
. The mean pH (H2O and KCl) in the upper 0.3 m was higher under PP than under DP and CE because of the higher application rate of dolomitic limestone. However, the differences in mean H activity of the equilibrium soil extracts among the three systems were not significant except for that in the KCl extract at 0.3- to 0.8-m soil depth between DP and CE. In all soils, the pH increased with depth, except the pH (H2O) under PP, indicating the surface acidification. In the topsoil, the pH (H2O) was higher than the pH (KCl) while in the subsoil the reverse was true. The reason for this observation is that in the subsoil positive charges dominate because of low organic matter and high oxide concentrations (Driessen and Dudal, 1989).
|
Similar C concentrations and higher N and S concentrations in soils under pasture than under CE result in smaller C/N and C/S ratios under pasture than under CE. Increased N concentrations in the subsoil and narrowing C/N ratios were also found in soils under Pinus caribaea Morelet plantations in the same region when compared with soils under CE (Lilienfein et al., 2001a). However, the subsoil accumulation of N was less pronounced in the pasture soils than under Pinus. The result indicates that under the pastures, like under Pinus, NO-3 was leached from the surface soil to greater depth where it was stored, probably because of sorption to positively charged surfaces (Morais et al., 1976). Thus, pasture use results in the formation of a subsoil N reservoir, which still may be recycled to the surface by plants. Similar observations have been made in the Amazonian region by Cahn et al. (1992) for Oxisols under corn and by Schroth et al. (1999) for Oxisols under mixed tree plantations.
At the 0- to 0.3-m soil depth, the mean effective cation-exchange capacity (ECEC) increased significantly in the order, CE < DP < PP. This was the result of the increasing pH along the same line. In the same depth layer, mean exchangeable Ca and Mg concentrations also followed the trend CE < DP < PP reflecting the different fertilization rates. However, at soil depths >0.3 m, there were no significant differences in mean ECEC and mean exchangeable Ca and Mg concentrations between the three systems. Thus, the fertilizer effect was restricted to the topsoil. Mean exchangeable Al, Fe, K, and Na concentrations did not differ significantly between the three systems at any depth.
Our results indicate that 13 yr after fertilization, the fertility of the DP soils was still higher than that of the CE soils. To illustrate this, we calculated the storage of N, S, exchangeable Ca, and exchangeable Mg in the upper 0.3-m layer of the studied systems (Fig. 2) . Thus, in contrast to some pastures of the Amazonian region (Eden et al., 1991), the fertility of the DP did not drop to below that of the native system during the monitored period.
|
The mean soil solution pH during the two rainy seasons increased with increasing soil depth under CE and PP and only varied little with increasing depth under DP (Fig. 3a) . Under PP, the mean soil solution pH was significantly higher at the 0.15-m than at the 0.3-m depth, which was the result of the recent application of dolomitic limestone. Furthermore, the mean soil solution pH was significantly higher under PP than under CE and DP at all depths because of the regular maintenance fertilization. There were no significant differences in mean soil solution pH between DP and CE except at the 2-m depth, where pH was significantly higher under DP. The result indicates that the effect of the initial application of dolomitic limestone has reached 2 m depth after 13 yr.
|
Under CE, NO3 concentrations in soil solution were higher in the upper 1 m of the soil than between 1- and 2-m depths; under PP and DP the converse was true (Fig. 3c). Nitrate concentrations in soil solution were low under all of the studied systems and often below the detection limit of 0.01 mg NO3N L-1. Nitrate concentrations in all soils of our study were below the mean of 1 mg NO3N L-1 that Uhl and Jordan (1984) reported for unfertilized forest soils in the Amazonian basin of Venezuela. Differences between PP and CE and between DP and CE were only significant at the 1.2- and 2-m depth. The result indicates that, under the pastures, the NO3 availability in the surface horizon was not changed compared with the CE while NO3 was leached to greater soil depth. Thus, N losses from the rooting zone may be expected in spite of the increased NO3 sorption to positively charged surface sites in the subsoil. Ammonium, P, and S concentrations in soil solution were below the detection limits of 0.01 mg NH+4-N L-1, 0.2 mg P L-1, and 0.3 mg S L-1 in all samples.
Under PP, mean K, Ca, and Mg concentrations decreased with increasing soil depth (Fig. 3df). Under CE and DP, mean Ca concentrations also decreased with increasing soil depth, mean K concentration decreased between the 0.15- and 0.3-m depth and increased at greater depth, and mean Mg concentration varied little with depth. Increased nutrient concentrations in surface soil solution may be the result of fertilizing and nutrient cycling by plants. Except for the Ca concentrations in the topsoil solution of PP, all base metal concentrations were at the lower boundary of nutrient concentrations reported for unfertilized tropical forests soils of 0.4 to 1.4 mg K L-1, 0.4 to 2.5 mg Ca L-1, and 0.1 to 0.2 mg Mg L-1 (Steinhardt, 1979; Jordan, 1982; Hölscher, 1995). The concentrations of Ca, K, and Mg were higher under PP than under CE and DP at all soil depths. Potassium concentrations of Replicate 1 of DP (DP1) at the 2-m soil depth were consistently higher (on average: 0.6 mg L-1) than those of DP2 (0.23) and DP3 (0.15). Under DP1, K concentrations at the 2-m depth were also consistently higher than at the 1.2-m depth (0.12). We cannot explain the increase in K concentrations between the 1.2- and 2-m soil depth under DP1, but as this was only observed in one of the three plots, the K concentrations at the 2-m soil depth under DP shown in Fig. 3d only represent the mean of the values under DP2 and DP3. Increased Ca, K, and Mg concentrations in the surface soil solution under PP and increased Ca and K concentrations under DP than under CE illustrate the increased fertility of both pasture types. The differences in base metal concentrations were much smaller at the 2-m depth than in the surface soil solution indicating that little leaching occurred.
The depth distribution of mean Mn concentrations in soil solution was similar in all three studied systems (Fig. 3g). Manganese concentrations decreased between 0.15 and 0.3 m soil depth, increased between 0.3 and 1.2 m and did not change between 1.2 and 2 m. Manganese concentrations reported as typical for tropical forest soils of 11 to 77 µg L-1 (Steinhardt, 1979; Jordan, 1982; Hölscher, 1995) were higher than Mn concentrations in our study. Between the 0.8- and 2-m depth, Mn concentrations under DP were significantly higher than under CE and between the 1.2- and 2-m depths also than under PP. This indicated a higher risk of Mn-leaching losses possibly associated with TOC under DP than under the other systems.
Mean Zn concentrations tended to increase with depth under CE and DP while, under PP, the highest mean Zn concentration was observed at the 0.15-m soil depth (Fig. 3h). Under PP, Zn concentrations decreased between the 0.15- and 0.3-m depths but did not vary much between the 0.3- and 2-m depths. Mean Zn concentrations under PP were significantly lower than under DP at all soil depths and than under CE at the 0.8- to 2-m depth. Lower Zn concentrations in soil solution under PP than under DP and CE were probably caused by the higher solution pH under PP and therefore reduced Zn solubility (Brümmer et al., 1986). Higher Zn concentrations at 2 m depth under DP may, like those of Mn, reflect the higher TOC concentrations. Thus, under PP the Zn availability in the topsoil is not different than under CE while Zn losses to the deeper subsoil are reduced. Under DP, both Zn availability in the topsoil and the risk of Zn losses to the deeper subsoil are increased compared with CE.
Mean concentrations of the potentially toxic Al in soil solution were highly variable, which may be partly attributable to concentrations close to the detection limit (Fig. 3i). As we set all values below the detection limit to zero, the presented Al concentrations are an underestimation. Under DP, mean Al concentrations were higher than under CE down to the 1.2-m depth and than under PP down to the 0.8-m depth although not all differences were significant. As solution pH under CE and under DP was similar, higher Al concentrations under DP than under CE may only be explained by higher concentrations of TOC under DP and therefore more dissolved organocomplexes of Al (Vance et al., 1996). Thus, even the increased Al concentration would not result in an increased toxicity risk, because organo-complexes of Al are not toxic (Savory and Wills, 1991). Lowest Al concentrations of all three systems were observed at the 2-m soil depth. Similar findings were reported for the Pinus plantations in the same region (Lilienfein et al., 2000a) that can be explained by increasing soil solution pH and therefore decreasing Al solubility with increasing soil depth (Jardine and Zelazny, 1996).
In all systems, the element concentrations in soil solution at the beginning of the rainy season were higher at all depths than during the high rainy season. This effect is shown for selected elements in Fig. 4 . Increased element concentrations may be explained by dissolution of salts accumulated during the dry season and by mineralization of organic matter when the soil was rewetted that released soluble organic compounds, metal cations, N, P, and S (Birch, 1958; Sørensen, 1974; Matzner and Thoma, 1983). Similar results were reported for the temporal course of nutrient concentrations under Pinus plantations (Lilienfein et al., 2000a, 2001a). Thus, largest leaching losses have to be expected at the beginning of the rainy season when element concentrations in soil solution are highest but plant uptake is still limited. At this time, the soil water content at the 2-m depth increased in the order, CE < PP < DP (Lilienfein et al., 1999). Figure 4 illustrates that the "first flush" effect was more pronounced for base metals under PP than under DP and CE.
|
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The effects of pasture use on chemical properties of the soil solid phase and soil solution are generally small when compared with effects of other permanent cultures on savanna Oxisols like Pinus plantations reported in the literature. The pasture soils show increased fertility compared with the CE because they store more N, S, Ca, and Mg and show higher K, Ca, and Mg (only PP) concentrations in the topsoil solution.
When the nutrient concentrations in soil solution at the 2-m depth are used as indication of the risk of nutrient losses to below the rooting zone, only K, Mn, and N are lost from both pastures and Zn from DP to a higher extent than under CE. The Zn losses under the PP are even lower than under CE. However, there may be a "first flush" effect at the beginning of the rainy season when all element concentrations are higher than during the high rainy season and when the pastures have a higher water content than the CE. This may result in more pronounced leaching losses of nutrients from the pasture soils with higher nutrient concentrations than from the CE soils which is probably particularly true for base metals under PP.
Our results demonstrate that both pasture systems may be considered as sustainable with respect to soil fertility although in DP grass biomass productivity was decreased and soil fertility partly had returned to the level of the native CE.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received for publication September 8, 2000.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Wilcke and J. Lilienfein Nutrient Leaching in Oxisols Under Native and Managed Vegetation in Brazil Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 2, 2005; 69(4): 1152 - 1161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||