|
|
||||||||
a Cooperative Institute for Research in the Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0216
b Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011-1010
* Corresponding author (ewing{at}iastate.edu).
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
t, (m3 m-3) at which solute diffusion in that medium vanishes (i.e., becomes immeasurably small):
![]() | [1] |
This threshold water content arises in the following ratio of the diffusion coefficient of a solute in a porous medium (Dpm) with water content
, and the diffusion coefficient of the same solute in water, Dw:
![]() | [2] |
The (
-
t) term, a difference of fractional volumes, turns out to be the inverse of an important length scale from percolation theory applied on a continuum. In this Note we demonstrate that the proportionality, Eq. [2], can be readily derived in terms of critical exponents of percolation theory.
| Theory |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, with the prefactor L0 on the order of an individual bond length, and
= 0.88 being a critical exponent of percolation theory. When p = pc, it is possible to find a sample-spanning (
infinite
) path across a lattice of arbitrary size using connected bonds only. The so-called infinite cluster forming that path is fractal, and the path is tortuous. If a fraction p > pc of bonds is connected, then the largest (infinite) cluster is multiply connected, and the typical separation of both paths and nodes is also L = L0 |p - pc|-
. On the other hand, the tortuous distance along the percolation path between nodes,
, is somewhat larger than L and is given by
= |p - pc|-1. Finally, not all connected bonds connect to the infinite cluster itself. Only a fraction P = (p - pc)ß (with ß = 0.4 in three dimensions) are actually part of the infinite cluster. Thus P = 0 at p = pc. Note that the form of these results is expected to be the same in continuum as in bond percolation.
In the case of continuum percolation, the relative volume fraction, V, and its critical value for percolation, Vc, play the roles of p and pc. These volume fractions can be related to fractional moisture contents. In recent treatments of the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, K(
), in terms of critical path analysis (Hunt and Gee, 2002a), it was shown that K(
) depends on a critical moisture content,
c, for percolation. Specifically, for
<
c it is not possible to construct an infinite pathway along which capillary flow occurs, so (in soils terminology) once capillary continuity is broken, water movement across the sample must occur partially (or primarily, depending on the value of the moisture content) through the much slower mechanism of film flow. Similarly, in Hunt and Gee (2002b), this critical value of the moisture content for capillary flow represents a minimum volumetric moisture content at which equilibration occurs by capillary flow, and thus the lower limit of soil moisture contents at which water retention can reasonably be measured at equilibrium. The numerical value of
c for flow was shown (Hunt and Gee, 2002b) to be nearly equal to that of Moldrup et al.'s (2001) threshold moisture content
t at which solute diffusion vanishes. In this contribution we will use continuum percolation theory, with the moisture content
playing the role of p (or V) and the threshold moisture content
c the role of pc (or Vc), to derive Eq. [2] within a proportionality constant.
The effective diffusion coefficient, Dpm, in saturated porous media is often given in terms of the aqueous diffusivity, Dw (Hillel, 1980; Ewing and Horton, 2003):
![]() | [3] |
is tortuosity and
is porosity. The empirical diffusive tortuosity was shown (Eq. [4] of Ewing and Horton, 2003) to scale as
![]() | [4] |
from Eq. [4] into Eq. [3] yields
![]() | [5] |
, will play the role of the porosity,
, in the prefactor. Equation [5] is very close to the experimentally observed relationship, Eq. [2]. Uncertainties in the exponents given in Ewing and Horton (2003) (the scaling of
to L was expected to yield the exponent 1.19 instead of 1.11) allow for a possible spread of values of the exponent on
-
c of from 0.98 to 1.05, the mean of which values differs from observation (Moldrup et al.'s [2001] exponent) by only 1.5%. Thus for all intents and purposes, the exponent of Eq. [5] is indistinguishable from that of Eq. [2], the argument
-
c is identical, and there is no reason to assume that the prefactor is greatly different.
The generalization, 

, for incomplete saturation, is somewhat subtle. In theoretical constructs, which do not account for diffusion over water films, it would be necessary to replace
with an accessible moisture content, P
= (
-
c)ß
, denoting that fraction of the water-filled porosity that is part of the infinite cluster of water-filled pores (all interconnected by water-filled pores). This important potential complication will be seen to be relevant for gas diffusion, but not for diffusion through water. The reason it is not relevant for water is based on the fact that those water filled pores which are not themselves part of the infinite cluster, can always be connected to it over films. The total distance over films (in the connections to the infinite cluster) can be shown to be microscopic (i.e., a few pore lengths; Hunt, 2003) and slowly varying in
for
>
c, while this distance jumps rapidly to macroscopic (on the order of the sample size) for
<
c. Thus if diffusion can proceed through films then the entire water-filled volume is approximately equally accessible for all
>
c.
To underscore the validity of Eq. [5] and our substitution 

we now consider gas diffusion. It is worth noting here that both solute and gas diffusion experiments are typically conducted along a primary drainage curve. During drainage, air cannot enter the system in significant volume until the air-accessible pore space
percolates,
that is, reaches the bubbling pressure. Thus the very presence of air in the medium (excluding pores near the edges) implies the percolation of the air phase. As a consequence, gas diffusion during drainage does not vanish at a finite volume of air, though in imbibition it would (the remaining, disconnected air volume termed
entrapped air
). Rather, gas diffusion vanishes when air accessible porosity
= 0. As a practical consideration, gas effectively diffuses only through the air-filled pores, since gas diffusion through water is inherently much slower than through air, in addition to requiring solution and exsolution, processes that are slow for typical test gases. Thus air-filled pores, which are not connected to the infinite cluster (of air-filled pores) do not contribute to the relevant porosity, and the relevant air-accessible porosity must be reduced from
by the factor (
/
)0.4. Here we guarantee that the fraction of air-filled sites that is interconnected is unity when
=
. In analogy to Eq. [5] we thus arrive at
![]() | [6] |
![]() | [7] |
The higher exponent, 2.4 in Eq. [6] rather than essentially 1 as in Eq. [5], appears to result from (i) the asymmetry between air entry and water drainage along a primary drainage curve (additional power of 1), and (ii) from the fact that water is wetting, leaving films which allow diffusion relatively efficiently when compared with the efficiency of air diffusion through water-filled pores (additional power of 0.4).
The present note is based on the presumption that this minimum water content represents the break-up of the network for capillary flow into disconnected regions when the moisture content is too low to permit percolation on a continuum. Of course this condition would necessitate the vanishing of any solute diffusion as well (except insofar as such could proceed over macroscopic distances through water filmspresumably orders of magnitude more slowly). As a consequence, and through comparison of experimental values (Hunt and Gee, 2002b), identical values for threshold moisture may be concluded to govern both flow and solute diffusion.
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received for publication August 20, 2002.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. A. Blank, A. G. Hunt, and T. E. Skinner A Numerical Procedure to Calculate Hydraulic Conductivity for an Arbitrary Pore Size Distribution Vadose Zone J., May 27, 2008; 7(2): 461 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Ewing and A. G. Hunt Dependence of the Electrical Conductivity on Saturation in Real Porous Media Vadose Zone J., May 26, 2006; 5(2): 731 - 741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Saripalli, V. L. Freedman, B. P. McGrail, and P. D. Meyer Characterization of the Specific Solid-Water Interfacial Area-Water Saturation Relationship and Its Import to Reactive Transport Vadose Zone J., May 26, 2006; 5(2): 777 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Hunt Continuum Percolation Theory for Saturation Dependence of Air Permeability Vadose Zone J., February 1, 2005; 4(1): 134 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Hunt and T. E. Skinner Hydraulic Conductivity Limited Equilibration: Effect on Water Retention Characteristics Vadose Zone J., February 1, 2005; 4(1): 145 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Hu, T. J. Kneafsey, J. J. Roberts, L. Tomutsa, and J. S. Y. Wang Characterizing Unsaturated Diffusion in Porous Tuff Gravel Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2004; 3(4): 1425 - 1438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Hunt Comparing van Genuchten and Percolation Theoretical Formulations of the Hydraulic Properties of Unsaturated Media Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2004; 3(4): 1483 - 1488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Hunt and G. W. Gee Wet-End Deviations from Scaling of the Water Retention Characteristics of Fractal Porous Media Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2003; 2(4): 759 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||