SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chantigny, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Pomar, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chantigny, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Pomar, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chantigny, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Pomar, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Fate
Right arrow Animal Waste
Right arrow Nutrients
Right arrow Nutrient Cycling
Right arrow Isotopes
Right arrow Nitrogen
Published in Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68:637-643 (2004).
© 2004 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

DIVISION S-8—NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT & SOIL & PLANT ANALYSIS

Dynamics of Pig Slurry Nitrogen in Soil and Plant as Determined with 15N

Martin H. Chantigny*,a, Denis A. Angersa, Thierry Morvanb and Candido Pomarc

a Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Soils and Crops Research and Development Centre, 2560 Hochelaga Blvd., Sainte-Foy, QC, Canada, G1V 2J3
b INRA, Unité Sol et Agronomie Rennes-Quimper, 65 Rue de Saint-Brieuc, F35042 Rennes, France
c Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre, P.O. Box 90, 2000, Road 108 East, Lennoxville, QC, Canada, J1M 1Z3

* Corresponding author (chantignym{at}agr.gc.ca).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The fate of pig (Sus scrofa) slurry labeled with 15N was investigated when applied on a clay soil (fine, mixed, frigid, Typic Humaquept) and a sandy loam (loamy, mixed, frigid, Typic Dystrochrept) cropped to maize (Zea mays L.) in 2000 and to barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in 2001. The slurry was applied in spring 2000, and plant and soil samples were collected at 6 h (Day 1) and at Days 14, 42, 96, and 413 after application. The samples were analyzed for 15N content in plant, in whole soil, and in soil NH4+–N, NO3–N, organic N, and clay-fixed N pools. Percentage 15N recovery was >93% in both soils at Day 1 and decreased slowly thereafter. Rapid clay fixation of slurry 15N occurred at Day 1, and was greater in the clay soil (34% of applied 15N) than in the sandy loam (11%). At Day 96, less of the applied slurry 15N was recovered in maize grown on the clay soil (29%), as compared with the sandy loam (50%). At the same period, the residual soil 15N was mostly present as organic N and NO3–N in the sandy loam, and as organic and clay-fixed N in the clay soil. At Day 413, 15N recovery in barley was about 3% of the initially applied N in both soils. The 15N recovery was generally higher in the clay soil than in the sandy loam, but total 15N recovery from the soil–plant system was similar for both soils. We conclude that soil type had little influence on the total 15N recovery from the soil–plant system, but significantly influenced the fate of slurry N in the various soil pools and plant N uptake on the year of application.

Abbreviations: NDFPS, nitrogen derived from pig slurry


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
IN THE PROVINCE of Québec, Canada, 9 million m3 of pig slurry are applied each year on agricultural land, representing an input of about 33 million kg N. Mismanagement of this N can increase the risk of pollution of water (Westerman et al., 1985; Spalding and Exner, 1993) and air (Chadwick et al., 1998; Sommer and Hutchings, 2001). At time of spreading, pig slurry generally contains >60% of its N as NH4+ (Sommer and Husted, 1995). This NH4+ can be lost through volatilization, which is generally the major mechanism of slurry N loss (Morvan et al., 1997; Rochette et al., 2001; Sommer and Hutchings, 2001). Under field conditions, 15 to 25% of added slurry NH4+ was found to be immobilized in soil organic matter (Morvan et al., 1997; Sørensen and Amato, 2002). In clay soils, 24% of animal slurry NH4+ was found to be fixed to clay particles (Ross et al., 1985), as compared with 5 to 10% in a sandy loam (Trehan and Wild, 1993). Pig slurry NH4+ is rapidly nitrified in soil after application (Morvan et al., 1997; Chantigny et al., 2001), and can be lost through denitrification and leaching if not taken up by the plants. Nitrogen losses through denitrification in soils amended with pig slurry were found to vary from <1% to >30%, partly depending on soil moisture conditions (Carey et al., 1997; Chadwick et al., 1998; Maag and Vinther, 1999). Nitrogen losses through leaching were detected only at high manure loading rates (Westerman et al., 1985; Spalding and Exner, 1993) and in well-drained soils (Spalding and Exner, 1993).

The apparent N use efficiency of spring-applied pig slurry was estimated to be 10% in maize (Miller and MacKenzie, 1978), 3 to 22% in spring wheat (Garand, 1999), and 30 to 90% in winter wheat (Smith and Chambers, 1992). With 15N, crop recovery of pig slurry N was found to average 31% in rice (He et al., 1994), 29% in ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) (Morvan et al., 1997), and 14 to 40% in a barley–ryegrass stand (Sørensen and Amato, 2002).

Even though the general mechanisms of slurry N transformations and losses are known, the actual proportions of pig slurry N that are lost to the environment, recovered by the crop, or left in the soil remain to be elucidated. Moreover, the rate of release of the immobilized and clay-fixed N, and the influence of clay fixation on slurry N availability have been little studied. The proportion of slurry N recovered by the crop as well as the fate and form of slurry N remaining in the soil at harvest would be influenced by soil texture (Sørensen and Amato, 2002).

The use of 15N as a tracer is the most powerful tool to distinguish the fate of a particular N source from background soil N (Fillery and Recous, 2001). Feeding poultry (Kirchmann, 1990), hog (He et al., 1994; Chantigny et al., 2004) and sheep (Sørensen and Jensen, 1998; Jensen et al., 1999) with a 15N-enriched diet has been used to obtain animal manure labeled in both its mineral and organic fractions to study the fate of manure N in the soil–plant system. The aim of the present study was to use pig slurry, enriched with 15N in both its mineral and organic fractions, to determine the fate of slurry N following application on two agricultural soils of contrasting texture.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Manure Characteristics and Experimental Setup
A young (20 kg) castrated pig was fed for 12 d with 15N-enriched maize and soybean (Glycine max L.) as the protein N sources. Maize and soybean were served in a ratio (2.2:1) typical of commercial feeds used in the province of Québec. Urine and feces were collected as proposed by He et al. (1994) for 20 d after start of 15N-feeding. Urine and feces collected from Days 4 to 18 were pooled in the same ratio (1.9:1) that they were excreted. A total of 4.5 kg of solids were present in the pooled excreta, and tap water was added to obtain 600 L of a dilute slurry. Diluted slurry was used to ensure uniform field application. The slurry was incubated for 4 wk under anaerobic conditions in a PVC container. Before incubation, 1 L of mature pig slurry was poured into the container to ensure that microorganisms commonly found in standard earthen storage tanks were present. At the time of application, subsamples of the applied slurry were collected and analyzed (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Selected characteristics of the pig slurry used in this experiment.

 
On 23 May 2000, experimental plots (four on each soil type) were established on a Kamouraska clay (fine, mixed, frigid, Typic Humaquept) and a St-André sandy loam (loamy, mixed, frigid, Typic Dystrochrept). Those two sites were located about 500 m from each other on an experimental farm of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (71°12' W, 46°49' N; altitude, 45 m; Slope < 2%) in a cool, humid area with mean annual temperature of 4°C and mean annual precipitation of 1200 mm. Selected characteristics of the soils are given in Table 2. Each experimental plot was 4.5 m x 9 m in size, and a 3- x 3-m microplot was established at the center of each plot. On 26 May, seven rows of maize were hand sown in each plot with 0.75-m spacing between rows and 0.15-m spacing on the row. As recommended by soil tests, 17.5 kg P ha–1 and 83 kg K ha–1 were applied as mineral fertilizers at seeding (Conseil des Productions Végétales du Québec, 1994). At the six- to eight-leaf stage (June 30), the 15N-labeled slurry was applied as uniformly as possible on the whole surface of each microplot at a rate of 7.5 L m–2 with watering cans. The applied slurry was immediately (within seconds) mixed with the surface soil (top 2–3 cm) with hand tools to minimize NH3 volatilization. Slurry application provided 61 kg N ha–1 and 12 kg P ha–1. An equivalent amount of N was applied as NH4NO3 on the unamended part of the experimental plots. According to the current provincial regulations, fertilization with animal manure is based on crop P requirement, which was 26.5 kg P ha–1 for maize in the area of study (Conseil des Productions Végétales du Québec, 1994). After slurry application, a total of 29.5 kg P ha–1 had been applied. The maximum amount of N applicable to maize at the six- to eight-leaf stage is 90 kg N ha–1 in the area of study. However, no additional N was added to avoid dilution of the slurry 15N. On 3 Oct. 2000 (96 d after slurry application), maize was harvested and the soil was not tilled. The next spring, barley was sown (direct-drilled) on the experimental plots and fertilized with 70 kg N ha–1 as recommended in the area of study (Conseil des Productions Végétales du Québec, 1994). Barley was harvested on 16 Aug. 2001 (413 d after slurry application).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Selected characteristics of the soils used in this experiment.

 
Soil and Plant Sampling and Analyses
Soil samples were collected from the microplots 6 h (Day 1), and 14, 42, 96, and 413 d after slurry application. A minimum of 50 cm at the periphery of the microplots was left unsampled to minimize edge effects. At each sampling date, soil cores (0- to 30-cm depth) were taken manually from the microplots with a 2-cm-diam. stainless steel probe. In the maize plots (2000), three cores were collected on the row, three others 15 to 20 cm away from the row, and three at the interrow. In the barley plots (2001), three cores were collected on the row and three at the interrow. Each of the collected cores was divided into 0- to 10-, 10- to 20- and 20- to 30-cm depths. Care was taken to minimize contamination between subcores of different depths. Deeper soil cores were also collected manually at the 30- to 60-cm depth in both soils, and at the 60- to 90-cm depth in the clay soil with a 5-cm-diam. stainless steel Dutch auger. Sampling at the 60- to 90-cm depth was not possible in the sandy loam because of the abundance of stones. In the case of deep soil cores, three cores were taken on the row, and three at the interrow for a total of six cores per depth in each microplot. All soil cores collected in a microplot at a given depth were sieved at 6 mm and pooled to make one soil sample per depth per microplot. Soil (0- to 30-cm depth) and plant samples were also collected outside of the microplots to correct the data for 15N natural abundance. At the beginning of the experiment and after harvests, soil bulk density was determined at all sampling depths using soil cores (Culley, 1993).

After sieving, soil samples were put into plastic bags and immediately brought to the laboratory for analyses. Gravimetric soil water content was measured after soil drying at 105°C for 24 h. Exchangeable NH4+–N and NO3–N were extracted by shaking 30 g of field-moist soil with 60 mL of 2 M KCl for 1 h, followed by centrifugation (3000 g, 10 min) and filtration on acid-washed filter papers (Whatman no. 42). This extraction was performed twice on each soil sample and both extracts were pooled (Morvan et al., 1997). After removal of mineral N, the soil residue was resuspended and washed by shaking for 30 min with 100 mL of distilled water. After centrifugation (16000 x g, 10 min), most of the wash water was decanted and the soil was dried at 55°C and finely ground (<100 mesh) with a ball mill.

Ammonium-N content in the KCl extracts was determined by colorimetry (N'konge and Ballance, 1982), whereas NO3–N content was measured in the UV at 210 nm with a liquid chromatograph (Model 4000i, Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA) according to Ziadi et al. (1999). The 15N content of the KCl extracts was determined by steam distillation with MgO (15NH4+–N) and Devarda (15NO3–N) as described by Keeney and Nelson (1982), but with 0.1 M H2SO4 solution instead of H3BO3 to trap NH3. Each distillate was adjusted to pH 4.0 to 5.0 with 0.1 M NaOH, dried at 60°C, and the precipitate was transferred into tin capsules for 15N determination by mass spectrometry. Stable isotope ratios of N were measured (Stable Isotope Facility Lab, UC Davis, CA) by continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry after sample combustion to N2 at 1000°C in an on-line elemental analyzer (PDZ Europa, Northwich, Cheshire England).

The total N content of the finely ground whole soil and of the soil residue after KCl extraction was determined by dry combustion (LECO CNS-1000, Leco Corp., St. Joseph, MI). The N content of the soil residue was considered to represent the organic plus clay-fixed fraction of the whole soil N. A subsample of the soil residue was treated with KOBr to quantify clay-fixed N (Silva and Bremner, 1966). The organic N content of the soil was calculated as the difference between total N content in the soil residue and clay-fixed N. The 15N content of the whole soil and of both the untreated and KOBr-treated soil residues was determined directly on finely ground solid samples by mass spectrometry as described above. All measured soil parameters were expressed on a surface basis (m–2) with measured soil bulk densities, and the isotopic excess data were used to calculate the 15N mass balance and distribution among the various soil N pools. For soil samples collected 413 d after slurry application, the total N and 15N contents were only determined on the whole soil.

Plant samples (0.375 m2) were collected in each microplot 14 and 42 d after slurry application. At 96 and 413 d after application, maize and barley were harvested at maturity (0.75 m2), and grains were separated from the vegetative parts. Plant samples were dried at 60°C until constant weight, and total dry matter yield was calculated. Plant samples were ground to 5 mm. A subsample was then taken and finely ground (< 100 mesh) for total N measurement by dry combustion and 15N determination by mass spectrometry as described above.

The effects of soil type on the amounts of slurry 15N that were recovered in the measured soil and plant N pools were tested with a Student's t test (Little and Hills, 1978) at each sampling date.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Slurry Characteristics and 15N Content
The applied slurry had a low dry matter content (Table 1) close to slurries originating from commercial sow operations in the province of Québec (8–15 kg m–3). The 15N content of the slurry mineral N fraction was 1.446 ± 0.036 atom%, compared with 1.458 ± 0.051 atom% for the organic N fraction, indicating a uniform 15N distribution between the mineral and organic N fractions of the slurry. The distribution of 15N between the labile and recalcitrant organic N was not investigated. An uneven distribution of 15N within the organic N fraction could induce some bias when estimating soil N fluxes following slurry application (Sørensen and Jensen, 1998; Jensen et al., 1999). However, since organic N represented only 10% of the slurry total N (Table 1), this uncertainty was considered to be acceptable.

15N Recovery
The excess 15N applied as pig slurry was 66.4 mg m–2 in both soils. Total 15N recovery 6 h (Day 1) after slurry application averaged 94% in the clay soil and 98% in the sandy loam (Fig. 1) . After 14 d, total 15N recoveries were 91 and 98% in the clay soil and sandy loam, respectively. Unrecovered 15N after slurry application has been attributed mostly to ammonia volatilization (Morvan et al., 1997; Sørensen and Amato, 2002). This phenomenon usually occurs during the first few days following slurry application (Morvan et al., 1997; Rochette et al., 2001; Sommer and Hutchings, 2001). Ammonia losses have been reported to account for up to 40% of slurry-added 15NH4+ on the day of application (Morvan et al., 1997). In our study, the low dry matter content of the slurry, the immediate mixing of pig slurry with surface soil (2- to 3-cm depth), and the frequent rainfall on the days following slurry application (Fig. 2) likely depressed ammonia volatilization, as reflected by the high total 15N recovery 14 d after application (Fig. 1, Table 3). Even though not statistically significant, the total 15N recoveries suggest that some volatilization might have occurred in the clay soil, but it was negligible in the sandy loam.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Total 15N recovery in whole soil and aboveground plant parts as a function of time following application of 15N-labeled pig slurry on a clay soil and a sandy loam. Vertical bars represent standard deviation of the mean, n = 4.

 


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Daily precipitation and average air temperature at the site of experiment. Arrows indicate the days of year 2000 when major field operations were performed.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Distribution of pig slurry 15N{dagger} in various soil and plant N pools as a function of time after application on a clay soil and a sandy loam.

 
After ammonia volatilization, denitrification and nitrate leaching are the most likely mechanisms of slurry N loss from the soil–plant system (Morvan et al., 1997; Chadwick et al., 1998; Chantigny et al., 2001). In our case, total 15N recovery decreased from 94 to 88% in the clay soil and from 98 to 97% in the sandy loam from Days 1 to 96 (Fig. 1). These results indicate that slurry N losses through denitrification or leaching during the growing season were low, not exceeding an average of 6% of the applied slurry N. The only exception to this was at Day 42 in the sandy loam where only 80% of slurry-applied 15N was recovered. However, since the total 15N recovery was back to previous values at Day 96, the 15N recovery at Day 42 in the sandy loam was attributed to an underestimation in the amount of N present in the whole soil or plant. A further decrease in total 15N recovery of 8% in the clay soil and 13% in the sandy loam was measured from Days 96 to 413. This decrease likely occurred during the autumn-to-spring period either through denitrification, which may occur in snow-covered soils (Chantigny et al., 2002), or leaching of NO3 during snowmelt. Except at Day 42, differences in 15N recovery from the soil–plant system between the two soils were not statistically significant (Table 3). Across all sampling dates, CVs on the total 15N recoveries were 5 to 16% in the clay soil and 7 to 17% in the sandy loam, which is in the range of values reported by Fillery and Recous (2001) for experiments with mineral N fertilizers.

Slurry Nitrogen Distribution and Transformations
The sum of 15N recovered in the various soil N pools was slightly lower than the 15N recovery in the whole soil in the sandy loam (<2.4 mg m–2), and greater differences (4–10 mg m–2) were found in the clay soil (Table 3). Lack of 15N recovery in the fractionation procedure could be due to the dissolved organic 15N in the KCl extracts, which was not accounted for. In addition, greater discrepancies in the clay soil than in the sandy loam could be explained by the loss of colloidal clay particles during the washing of the soil residue with distilled water after KCl extraction. This could have resulted in the loss of some clay-fixed and organic 15N.

Significant and rapid clay fixation of slurry NH4+ occurred following application. Six hours after application, 34 and 11% of slurry NH4+ were fixed to clay particles in the clay soil and in the sandy loam, respectively (Table 3). Clay fixation of applied NH4+ can last for several weeks, depending on the clay content of the soil (Drury and Beauchamp, 1991). Recently fixed N is gradually released as soil NH4+ is nitrified and removed by the plants (Drury and Beauchamp, 1991; Trehan and Wild, 1993). Our results indicate that in the clay soil, the amounts of clay-fixed slurry N increased from Days 1 to 14 and gradually decreased thereafter (Table 3). By contrast in the sandy loam, the amounts of slurry N fixed to clay markedly decreased from Days 1 to 14 and remained low thereafter. At Day 96, 20% of the added slurry 15N was still fixed to clay particles in the clay soil as compared with 2% in the sandy loam. The significantly (P < 0.01) greater amounts of clay-fixed 15N in the clay soil than in the sandy loam (Table 3) would be explained mostly by the greater clay content of the former (Table 2). The proportion of slurry-added N found in the clay-fixed pool of the clay soil at Day 96 is in agreement with Ross et al. (1985), who reported that 24% of total applied N was fixed to clay particles after 6 y of repeated cattle slurry application on a clay soil. Similarly, the proportions of clay-fixed slurry N found in the sandy loam are in line with the values reported (5–10%) by Trehan and Wild (1993) in a laboratory experiment on a similar soil type.

Six hours after application in both soils, slurry 15N was recovered as NH4+, organic N, and clay-fixed N (Table 3). The amounts of slurry 15NH4+ recovered in the sandy loam were significantly (P < 0.05) greater and about twice as those in the clay soil. This difference may be explained mostly by the greater clay fixation (34% vs. 11% of slurry-added N) measured in the clay soil than in the sandy loam. In both soils, the amounts of recovered slurry 15NH4+ markedly decreased from 1 to 14 d after application. For both soils, net rates of soil total NH4+ and 15NH4+ disappearance were similar (Table 4), indicating that in the present experiment, decreases in soil NH4+ content essentially reflected the dynamics of slurry-derived NH4+. On the contrary, soil NO3 accumulated at a rate two to five times higher than 15NO3, indicating that both slurry- and soil-derived NH4+ were contributing to soil NO3 formation. In both soils, the disappearance of 15NH4+ was compensated by the accumulation of 15N in the plant, NO3–N, and organic N pools (Table 3). From Days 1 to 14, the accumulation of 15NO3 was significantly (P < 0.01) lower in the clay soil than in the sandy loam, possibly reflecting the greater significance of clay-fixation in the clay soil as an alternative pathway for slurry NH4+.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Net total N and 15N transformation rates from 1 to 14 d following application of 15N-labeled pig slurry to a clay soil and a sandy loam.

 
Six hours after slurry application, 12 and 15% of slurry-added 15N were found in the soil organic N pool in the clay soil and in the sandy loam, respectively (Table 3). Those values essentially reflected the slurry input of organic N, which represented 10% of slurry total N (Table 1). The proportion of added slurry 15N accounted for by the organic N pool at Day 14 was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the sandy loam (44%) than in the clay soil (24%) (Table 3). The greater accumulation of organic 15N in the sandy loam than in clay soil can be explained partly by the rapid and greater clay fixation of slurry 15N in the clay soil, which likely decreased slurry NH4+ availability to the plants and microorganisms. Assuming that slurry organic N was mostly mineralized from Days 1 to 14 (Morvan et al., 1997), most of the organic 15N present at Day 14 would have represented the slurry N immobilized in the soil microbial biomass and maize roots. However, in the present study, it was not possible to discriminate between residual slurry organic N and the recently immobilized slurry N. Consequently, the values obtained at Day 14 might overestimate the actual proportion of slurry-applied N that was immobilized in the soil. In a laboratory experiment with forage grass, Chadwick et al. (2001) found that 6 to 8% of slurry NH4+–N was immobilized in the soil organic matter 8 d after application. In field experiments with cereals and forage grass, immobilization of slurry-applied NH4+–N has been found to range from 15 to 25% (Morvan et al., 1997; Sørensen and Amato, 2002). In the present study, the proportion of slurry-added 15N present in the soil organic N pool declined only 42 d after application (Table 3), likely reflecting the remineralization of senescing maize roots and microbially immobilized 15N.

At maize harvest (Day 96), significantly (P < 0.01) less of the applied slurry 15N was recovered by the crop in the clay soil (29%) than in the sandy loam (50%) (Table 3). This large difference was attributed partly to the greater clay fixation of slurry 15N measured in the clay soil than in the sandy loam, which likely reduced slurry N availability to maize. Reported plant N use efficiencies for spring-applied pig slurry vary from 3 to 90% in the literature depending on plant species, N loading rate, and management practices (surface-applied vs. incorporated). For a given plant species and N rate, the lowest plant N recoveries were found for surface-applied slurry (Miller and MacKenzie, 1978; Garand, 1999; Sørensen and Amato, 2002), whereas the highest plant N recoveries were found where the slurry was incorporated into the soil (Sørensen and Amato, 2002) or applied to a growing crop (Smith and Chambers, 1992; Morvan et al., 1997). For various crop species, the uptake of pig slurry N generally varied from 30 to 60% where the slurry was applied in the presence of a growing crop (Smith and Chambers, 1992; He et al., 1994; Morvan et al., 1997) and incorporated into the soil (Sørensen and Amato, 2002). Our values for postemergence application of pig slurry to maize are in this range. Barley was grown the year after cropping to maize, and at harvest (Day 413) this crop had recovered 3% of the initially added slurry 15N in the clay soil, and 4% in the sandy loam (Table 3; Fig. 1). Those values are in line with the 2 to 4% recovery reported by Sørensen and Amato (2002) for a barley crop grown on loamy soils on the second growing season after pig slurry application.

Total maize yields averaged 11.3 and 15.6 Mg ha–1 in the clay soil and in the sandy loam, respectively (Table 5), and were comparable with values reported in the same area (Tran et al., 1997). In both soils, the proportion of total maize nitrogen derived from pig slurry (NDFPS) varied from 11 to 15% (Table 5). The total N uptake by maize largely exceeded the amount of slurry N applied and could partly explain the high plant 15N recoveries and low 15N losses measured during the first growing season. Barley yields in the second year of the experiment were 5.0 and 5.4 Mg ha–1 in the clay soil and the sandy loam, respectively, and NDFPS was about 2% in both soils. Consequently, plant N uptake was greater in the coarser-textured soil on the year of slurry application, but the residual effect of pig slurry on crop nutrition on the second year was similar for both soils.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Maize and barley yields, total N uptake, proportion of plant N derived from pig slurry (NDFPS) and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in a clay soil and a sandy loam fertilized with 15N-labeled pig slurry.

 
At maize harvest (Day 96), whole soil 15N accounted for 58% of the initially added slurry 15N in the clay soil, and was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than in the sandy loam (47%) (Table 3). Moreover, the distribution of slurry N among the various soil N pools was strongly influenced by soil texture. As a result, about three times less 15NO3 and nine times more clay-fixed 15N were present in the clay soil than in the sandy loam. From 96 to 413 d after slurry application, the proportion of the initially added 15N recovered in the whole soil decreased from 58 to 48% in the clay soil, and from 47 to 31% in the sandy loam (Table 3). Considering the respective amounts of 15N recovered by barley and maize in both soils, 1.7 times more residual slurry 15N was lost from the soil–plant system in the sandy loam than in the clay soil in the second year of experiment. Therefore, residual 15N appeared to be less retained in the coarser-textured soil.

Slurry N migrated slowly down the soil profile after application, and at maize harvest (Day 96) most of the soil residual 15N was still present in the top 10 cm of both soils (Table 6). The clay soil contained significantly (P < 0.05) more residual 15N than the sandy loam only at the 0- to 10-cm depth. By contrast, significantly (P < 0.05) greater amounts of 15NO3 were present in the sandy loam than in the clay soil at all depths, indicating that the risk of slurry-derived N loss through leaching during the winter period was greater in the sandy loam.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Distribution of soil total residual 15N and 15NO3 as a function of soil depth 96 d after application (maize harvest) of 15N-labeled pig slurry on a clay soil and a sandy loam.

 

    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Use of pig slurry labeled with 15N in both its mineral and organic fractions allowed tracking the fate and distribution of the whole slurry-derived N in two soils of contrasting texture. Total recovery of slurry 15N in the soil–plant system after 2 yr was similar in the two soils. However, soil type significantly influenced the distribution of slurry 15N among the various soil and plant N pools. Plant uptake and nitrification of slurry N were significantly greater in the sandy loam than in the clay soil during the growing season when slurry was applied, but the residual effect of slurry N on the nutrition of the subsequent crop was similar for both soils. At the end of the first growing season, 26% of the initially added slurry N was still present as organic N in the clay soil, as compared with 34% in the sandy loam. In the clay soil, one third of the applied slurry N was fixed to clay particles on the day of application. At the end of the first growing season, this N pool still contained 20% of the added slurry N, as compared with only 2% in the sandy loam. We suggest that clay fixation might have a determinant influence on slurry N availability to the crop in high-fixing clay soils, especially during the growing season when slurry is applied. Given the large amounts of slurry N found in the organic and clay-fixed N pools at the end of the first growing season, the long-term fate of this residual N must be investigated.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This study was financially supported by the Québec Hog Producers Federation (FPPQ) and the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Matching Investment Initiative. We gratefully thank Patrice Jolicoeur, Nicole Bissonnette, Johanne Tremblay, and Marie-Anne Langevin for their assistance in various aspects of this study.

Received for publication March 4, 2003.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
P. Rochette, D. A. Angers, M. H. Chantigny, and N. Bertrand
Nitrous Oxide Emissions Respond Differently to No-Till in a Loam and a Heavy Clay Soil
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2008; 72(5): 1363 - 1369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. A. Ruiz Diaz, J. E. Sawyer, and A. P. Mallarino
Poultry Manure Supply of Potentially Available Nitrogen with Soil Incubation
Agron. J., August 11, 2008; 100(5): 1310 - 1317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. S. Paschold, B. J. Wienhold, D. L. McCallister, and R. B. Ferguson
Crop Nitrogen and Phosphorus Utilization following Application of Slurry from Swine Fed Traditional or Low Phytate Corn Diets
Agron. J., June 16, 2008; 100(4): 997 - 1004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
E. R. Loria, J. E. Sawyer, D. W. Barker, J. P. Lundvall, and J. C. Lorimor
Use of Anaerobically Digested Swine Manure as a Nitrogen Source in Corn Production
Agron. J., June 26, 2007; 99(4): 1119 - 1129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
P. Sorensen and I. K. Thomsen
Separation of Pig Slurry and Plant Utilization and Loss of Nitrogen-15-labeled Slurry Nitrogen
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 25, 2005; 69(5): 1644 - 1651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
G. L. Velthof, J. A. Nelemans, O. Oenema, and P. J. Kuikman
Gaseous Nitrogen and Carbon Losses from Pig Manure Derived from Different Diets
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2005; 34(2): 698 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
M. L. Hutchison, L. D. Walters, A. Moore, K. M. Crookes, and S. M. Avery
Effect of Length of Time before Incorporation on Survival of Pathogenic Bacteria Present in Livestock Wastes Applied to Agricultural Soil
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., September 1, 2004; 70(9): 5111 - 5118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chantigny, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Pomar, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chantigny, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Pomar, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chantigny, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Pomar, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Fate
Right arrow Animal Waste
Right arrow Nutrients
Right arrow Nutrient Cycling
Right arrow Isotopes
Right arrow Nitrogen


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome