|
|
||||||||
a USDAARS, Sugarcane Field Station, 12990 U.S. Hwy. 441, Canal Point, FL 33438
b Everglades Research and Education Center, Univ. of Florida, 3200 E. Palm Beach Road, Belle Glade, FL 33430
* Corresponding author (dmorris{at}saa.ars.usda.gov).
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abbreviations: BO, 14C-benzoate oxidation EAA, Everglades Agricultural Area MBC, microbial biomass carbon OM, organic matter RESP, soil respiration (CO2 evolution) SM, soil moisture SOC, soluble organic carbon T7, temperature at the 7-cm depth
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An additional problem for producers is mineralization of P from soil OM. Phosphorus release from OM oxidation has been estimated at 72 kg ha1 yr1 (Diaz et al., 1993). Since federal and state governments have targeted P for reductions in the waterways, producers must reduce P levels in drainage waters by 25%, pay a land use privilege tax of $61.50 ha1 yr1, and follow best management practices to reduce P levels in waterways (Izuno et al., 1999). Best management practices to control both soil oxidation and P losses include maintaining water tables as high as possible without jeopardizing crop yields and growing crops that are tolerant to high water table levels (Anderson and Flaig, 1995).
There are few methods that can be used to monitor soil loss under replicated field experiments (Lal, 1998). Soil subsidence in the EAA was measured approximately every 5 yr from the early 1900s until 1978 by surveying marker posts driven to bedrock (Shih et al., 1997). Marker posts cannot be placed in sugarcane fields because they would easily be damaged by heavy equipment that must pass through the fields during planting, fertilizing, cultivating, and harvesting. Short-term methods to monitor OM degradation potential under cropped conditions are necessary to evaluate the effects of crop and water table management practices in the EAA to reduce or prevent soil loss and mineralization of P. Three methods have potential for use. The first method applies a recalcitrant 14C-labeled substrate to the soil to measure the oxidative activity of microorganisms. The second method measures soil CO2 evolution to determine microbial respiration, and the third method estimates soil MBC to indicate changes in microbial populations.
The 14C-labeled organic compound method was used by Tate and Terry (1980) who reported that oxidation of aromatic ring compounds (14C-labeled salicylate) in aerobic Histosols was correlated to moisture content of the soil. Under flooded conditions for 25 d, measuring catabolism from aromatic ring compounds (salicylate) was better than measuring catabolism from simple carbohydrates (glucose) and amino acids (mixture), because the aromatic ring compound was more resistant to decomposition than the other chemicals (Tate, 1979a). In another study, extrapolation of oxidation rates from 14C-labeled acetate and succinate applied to soil taken from a drained field showed close agreement with actual long-term rates for soil loss calculated from field marker posts (Tate, 1979b). Disadvantages for using the 14C method are the high cost of purchasing and disposing of labeled compounds, and compliance with federal and state regulations regarding use of radioactive substances.
Carbon dioxide evolution by soil microorganisms is a direct measure of soil C loss and has been used to measure subsidence potential from fallow organic soil (>85% OM) in the laboratory (Knipling et al., 1970; and Volk, 1973). However, when plant roots are present, CO2 evolution may overestimate subsidence because plant roots contribute as much as 40% of the total CO2 respiration in the rhizosphere as shown for a mineral soil (<5% OM) (Cheng et al., 1993). In Histosols, the relative contribution of CO2 respiration from plants and microbes has not been reported. Since Histosols in the EAA often contain >85% OM in the upper 21 cm of their profiles (Zelazny and Carlisle, 1974), it is possible that the influence of microbial respiration is much greater than that from plant roots. Therefore, measuring CO2 evolution could provide an accurate method to monitor OM oxidation potential with different water table management schemes.
Microbial biomass is an important portion of the soil OM, ranging between 7 and 66 mg biomass C g1 total C in organic soils (Tate and Terry, 1980). Estimation of MBC has been reported to be a sensitive indicator for detecting changes in SM and input of organic materials over the crop season (He et al., 1997). Since increasing the water table reduces soil O2 levels, which results in lower populations of aerobic microorganisms (Robert and Chenu, 1995), monitoring MBC is likely a viable method to determine potential soil OM oxidation at varying water table depths.
An experiment was conducted in a Histosol to evaluate methods (BO, RESP, and MBC) of determining short-term OM oxidation potential under alternate flood and drain management. Sugarcane was used because it is grown on about 80% of the land area in the EAA (Izuno et al., 1999). Results from this study should provide a better understanding of the relationships among microbial parameters in soils planted to sugarcane and improve our basis for making water table management recommendations that will result in better control of soil oxidation rates.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Each lysimeter was equipped with one pump to move excess water out. Pumps were regulated by ball floats located inside the lysimeters that switched a solenoid valve to an on or off position, depending on the water table level. A timer regulated another solenoid valve in each lysimeter to allow well water to enter the lysimeters once per day for 2 min., which amounted to a total volume of 40 L. Onsite observations of lysimeters containing sugarcane in grand growth stage of development (time of greatest rate of dry matter accumulation; Fageria et al., 1997), indicated that this volume of water was sufficient to maintain daily water table levels within 5 cm. The well water entered each lysimeter through a perforated pipe that ran down one side and then diagonally across its bottom. Water was allowed to enter from the bottom of the lysimeter because most water enters fields in the EAA from canals by passing through cracks in the bedrock and horizontally through the soil profile.
Before initiation of the experiment, soils in the lysimeters were sampled between the 0- to 15-cm depth and analyzed for nutrient content (Sanchez, 1990). On the basis of soil-test recommendations for sugarcane, we applied 19 and 139 kg ha1 of elemental P as Ca(H2PO4)2 and K as KCl, respectively. In addition, a commercial micronutrient mix (Product F-503 G, Frit Industries, Ozark, AL) containing B, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mo, and Zn were uniformly applied across the soil surface at elemental rates of 0.1, 0.1, 0.7, 0.3, 0.1, and 0.3 kg ha1, respectively. Nitrogen was not applied because mineralization rates of EAA organic soils may be as high as 1200 kg N ha1 yr1 (Terry, 1980). Consequently, fertilizer N is not recommended for sugarcane growing in Histosols of the EAA (Sanchez, 1990). Average soil pH (water) was 7.8, which is expected for these soils because they overlay limestone bedrock (Anderson and Ulloa 1989; and Sanchez, 1990).
Planting
On 1 Feb. 2001, lysimeters were drained and two rows of sugarcane stalk pieces (
45-cm length) were planted along the greatest length in each lysimeter at a row spacing of 1.2 m. Two genotypes were selected from a group of high-yielding genotypes in the final selection stages of a breeding program at the USDAARS Sugarcane Field Station, Canal Point, FL. Within each lysimeter, one row of sugarcane was genotype CP 95-1376 and the other row was genotype CP 95-1429. After planting, water tables were raised to 16 cm for 2 wk to allow for rapid eye germination on stalks pieces, followed by 33-cm water tables until the plants were established and treatments imposed on the lysimeters.
Treatments
Four water table treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications starting on 3 Apr. 2001: (i) continuously drained to a 50-cm depth, (ii) flooded for 7 d followed by drainage to a 50-cm depth for 14 d, (iii) flooded for 7 d followed by drainage to a 33-cm depth for 14 d, and (iv) flooded for 7 d followed by drainage to a 16-cm depth for 14 d. All water table treatments were cycled continuously during the summer growing season. Water level for flood treatments during the flooded periods were maintained 0 to 5 cm above the soil surface. The 7-d flood was chosen because EAA soils planted with sugarcane are rarely flooded for more than a week after heavy rains. The 14-d drainage period was selected to allow for recovery of the aerobic microorganisms. The length of time needed for stability of microbial activity and mass in Histosols after short periods of flood has not been reported.
Soil Sampling
Soils under four consecutive flood and drain cycles were sampled from 16 July through 3 Oct. 2001. Within each cycle, soil samples were taken during the drain period at 0, 3, 7, and 14 d of drainage. A soil sample was also taken during the flood period on the day immediately before drainage (1 d). Thus, the 1 and 0 represent the last day of flood and first few hours of drain, respectively. A sample was not taken on the last day of flood from the continuously drained treatment because there was no flood period in that treatment. At each sampling date, six soil samples were taken between the two rows of sugarcane from both ends of each lysimeter at the 0- to 15-cm depth with a 2-cm diameter probe. The six soil samples from the ends of the lysimeters were then composited to provide two subsamples for each lysimeter. One soil temperature (T7) measurement was taken from each lysimeter at the 7-cm depth.
Soil Analysis
On the same day of sampling, SM was determined gravimetrically and BO was measured by benzoate with a 14C-carboxyl label according to the method of Tate (1979b). Soil samples were mixed thoroughly inside plastic bags. All samples were analyzed by adding 0.5 mL of deionized water containing 12 nmol 14C (carboxyl)-benzoate (specific activity of 344 mBq µmol1) to 10 g fresh soil inside a glass culture tube (20 x 150 mm). Benzoate was used because it is a major intermediate in the decomposition of aromatic compounds that are prevalent in organic soil, and it worked well in evaluating potential soil degradation in other organic soil studies (Williams and Crawford, 1983). The culture tube was stoppered, and the contents were mixed end-over-end, 20 times. The samples were then incubated for 2 h while a stream of air was passed over the soil surface and into 10 mL of 1 M NaOH trap solution. The apparatus was similar to that described by Zibilske (1994). At the conclusion of the incubations, the NaOH trap solution was analyzed for 14CO2 content using a scintillation counter (Model LS 3801, Beckman, Inc., Fullerton, CA). The quantity of CO2 evolved was calculated based on 14C content in benzoate.
Soil samples had different moisture contents ranging from 1.0 to 3.2 g H2O g1 dry soil, which resulted in every sample having a different substrate concentration. Because enzyme activity depends on substrate concentration, all data were adjusted to the average substrate concentration (1.67 µM) after 14C evolution analysis for microbial activities. Adjustments could be made because substrate was applied at less than saturating concentrations. At the levels of substrate applied in this study, there was a linear relationship between microbial activity and substrate concentration with origin at 0 for all treatments (Morris and Snyder, 2002). The adjustments to average substrate concentration was done according to the following equation:
![]() | [1] |
![]() | [2] |
Soil respiration was determined at time of soil sampling with a RESP module (9.8-cm diam. by 10.2 cm high) attached to a photosynthesis meter (Model CI 301 PS, CID, Inc., Camas, WA). The system was closed (air outside the chamber was not allowed to enter during RESP measurements), air was circulated inside the chamber and photosynthesis meter by two circulating fans and one small pump, respectively. Soil respiration was measured in situ on both ends of each lysimeter by manually placing the open end of the respiration module on the soil surface. To prevent outside air contamination entering the photosynthesis meter, the module was gently pressed into the soil to a depth of 1 cm. After each module positioning in the lysimeters, a computer program in the respiration instrument was manually activated, and a single CO2 concentration was automatically calculated after a 30-s stabilization period and recorded to a data logger. Data collected included CO2 evolution rate.
Microbial biomass C was determined by the fumigation extraction method of Wu et al. (1990). For each extraction, 5 g of soil plus 20 mL of extractant (0.5 M K2SO4) were used. Soil samples were shaken for 1 h and the extractant before and after chloroform fumigation was analyzed for organic C by high-temperature combustion (Dohrmann Model DC 190, Rosemount Analytical, Inc., Santa Clara, CA) (USEPA, 1987). Organic C in the extraction before fumigation was used to estimate SOC. Soluble organic C was monitored because it is a readily available energy source for microorganisms.
Statistical Analysis
The three replications of the four water table treatments (12 lysimeters) were arranged in a randomized complete block design. All statistical analyses were performed with PROC MIXED with the SAS statistical software package (SAS Institute, 1999). Data were analyzed as a split-plot design with cycles as repeated measures. The split plot was measurement day. On the basis of procedures described by Tao et al. (2002), the compound symmetry model (type = CS) was used to describe repeated measures covariance in all analyses. Correlations among BO, RESP, MBC, SOC, SM, and T7 were determined on sample means (days after drainage for each water table treatment). Significant and highly significant differences were identified at P
0.05 and P
0.01, respectively.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Microbial Biomass Carbon
The effect of water table depth and day were significant on MBC, while water table depth x day interaction was not significant (Table 1). After drainage, MBC increased with lower water table depths (Fig. 1C). The MBC increased to a maximum at Day 7 in all flood and drain water table treatments, then declined slightly during the remaining 7 d. The continuously drained treatment had the lowest MBC with a mean of 1.41 mg C g1 soil averaged across the drainage cycle.
Soil Environment Parameters
Soluble Organic Carbon
Soluble organic C was affected by day and water table depth x day interaction (Table 1). Among the flood and drain treatments, increasing the height of the water table tended to increase the SOC (Fig. 2A)
. After 3 d, the treatment that was continuously drained to a 50-cm water table and the flood followed by drainage to 50-cm water table treatment had similar SOC contents with a mean of 732 µg C g1 soil. Soluble organic C in the flood and drain treatments peaked on the last day of flood (1 d) with a mean of 927 µg C g1 soil. Soil SOC then declined during the next 7 d. The SOC response of the drain treatment during the 14-d drain period was one that fluctuated about a mean of 676 µg C g1 soil.
|
Soil Temperature
The T7 was affected by day (Table 1), with the responses among water table treatments being similar across the 14-d drain period (Fig. 2C). Temperature averaged across all water table treatments tended to increase up to 3 d after drainage followed by a decline. Ranges of temperatures were 25.4 to 27.7°C.
Correlations
Analyses indicated no correlations among BO, RESP, and MBC. However, BO was negatively correlated with SOC and SM (Table 2). Microbial biomass C was positively correlated with T7. Soluble organic C was influenced by water table since it was positively correlated with SM.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To detect differences in oxidation potential due to water table treatment, BO was preferable to RESP and MBC because BO tended to decrease as the depth to water table was reduced (Fig. 1A). This is the known response based on field measurements across long periods of time. Stephens et al. (1984) reported on long-term soil subsidence mostly from microbial oxidation in cropped Histosols from several countries around the world. Their study indicated that when soil loss was plotted against water table depth (3282 cm), positive linear prediction equations resulted from data analysis. Our data in the time period between 3 and 14 d of drain corroborate those of Tate (1979a)(1979b) suggesting that short-term measurements by BO depicts significant differences of soil OM oxidation potential because of water table treatment.
The flood followed by drainage to 50-cm water table tended to have greater BO than the continuous 50-cm water table treatment (Fig. 1A). This is also explainable in that alternate wetting and drying increases the rate of mineralization. Terry (1980) and Diaz et al. (1993) incubated organic soils under wetting and drying conditions in the laboratory. Terry (1980) indicated that N mineralization was doubled after 84 d of alternate wet and dry cycles compared with soil at 0.03 MPa SM. Diaz et al. (1993) showed that as much as 1.2 to 6.4 times more total P was released after flooding compared with continuously drained soils.
At the 16-cm water table, the BO tended to decrease during the drain period compared with the flooded state (Fig. 1A). This lowering of BO may have been because of sugarcane plants exerting a negative influence on BO by roots reducing O2 levels in the soil through respiration or excretion of toxic substances (Drew, 1997; Bowen and Rovira, 1999). Other research has shown that plants can exert a negative influence on OM oxidation. Tate (1980b) collected soil samples from fallow, sugarcane, and St. Augustinegrass fields and reported that there was greater oxidation of 14C-labeled salicylate under St. Augustinegrass compared with sugarcane or fallow. On the basis of a 7-yr field experiment with marker posts, Shih et al. (1978) showed there was about 30% less soil subsidence in sugarcane fields compared with pasture and truck crops. The influence of sugarcane on reducing BO in high water tables will require further investigation.
Another aspect of BO under the flooded condition was that the microbial activity was not zero (Fig. 1A). Broadbent (1960) showed that organic soil decomposition was only 20% less with 0.1% O2 in soil air compared with decomposition at 21% O2. Knipling et al. (1970) measured nonlabeled CO2 evolution from flooded soil in the laboratory, and also did not obtain a zero rate of flux. In a field study with 14C-labeled salicylate, Tate (1979a) did not obtain zero activity in a flooded soil. This result corresponds to research by Snyder et al. (2002), who measured CH4 generation in flooded rice fields in the EAA; CH4 production in soil is associated with anaerobic conditions. They could not detect significant amounts of CH4 evolution because O2 was carried by water that percolated through the soils at rates of 5 to 7 cm d1. Even if it were assumed that there were anaerobic pockets in the soil, oxidation of OM may not be stopped completely.
Unlike the BO response, RESP showed a large increase in CO2 flux within 24 h after drainage (Fig 1B). A similar response was reported within a few hours after tillage of drained mineral soils (Reicosky et al., 1997). The spike in CO2 after tillage was attributed to a rapid physical release from soil pores and solution. Since all the soil pore space in our flooded treatments was filled with water, the rapid increase of CO2 flux after drainage was due to increased aerobic microbial activity and/or increased sugarcane root respiration. When the stress from excess water was lessened immediately after drainage and O2 entered the pore spaces, facultative anaerobic or dormant aerobic microorganisms were revived so that there was a rapid increase in aerobic respiration without a corresponding increase in MBC. Root respiration would also increase after O2 entered the pore spaces because root cell metabolism is greater under aerobic than anaerobic soil conditions (Drew, 1997).
The rapid loss in SOC within 24 h after drainage (Fig. 2A) could have been due to microbial utilization. However, another mechanism for loss of carbohydrates is direct uptake by plant roots. This can be illustrated in the experiment of Sparling et al. (1982), where soils were amended with 14C OM, and barley was grown. Of the total labeled C that was lost from the soil, about half was incorporated in the plant roots. They surmised that uptake of organic compounds by plant roots could impact plant growth.
By 7 d after flooding, RESP of the flood and drain treatments had declined to a rate similar to that of the drained treatment (Fig. 1B). Since RESP in our study did not correspond to field measurements reported in the literature of OM oxidation potentials as related to water table depths (Stephens et al., 1984; and Shih et al., 1978), RESP was not a good method for monitoring OM oxidation potential under sugarcane. But we cannot eliminate the possibility that RESP measured in a soil without plants could provide adequate estimates of OM oxidation potential because amounts of plant root respiration in a mineral soil can represent a significant quantity of the total RESP. Cheng et al. (1993) used 14C labeling of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and estimated that 40% of the total respiration in the rhizosphere was due to roots with the remaining contribution from microorganisms.
Contrary to expectations, MBC tended to increase as water tables approached the soil surface (Fig. 1C). Robert and Chenu (1995) reported that bacterial, actinomycete, and fungal numbers decreased as SM increased. However, they used plate counts, which measured only active microbes that grew on the selective media used in their study. Our experiment was different in that we measured the total MBC (active and dormant microbes). Perhaps estimating MBC of both active and dormant microorganisms would provide the reasons for the increase in MBC with increasing water table levels (Horwath and Paul, 1994). Because of the uncertainty of what MBC represents and because MBC did not follow expected responses due to water table treatment, MBC does not appear to be a good method to estimate oxidation potential of Histosols under sugarcane. Even though there was greater mass of microbes with higher water tables, there was less microbial activity (BO). Future research should strive to partition the active from the dormant soil microbial populations.
Monitoring SOC may also provide a means to indicate the potential for OM oxidation. Soluble organic C tended to increase as water tables were raised (Fig. 2A), and there was a negative correlation with BO. The increase in SOC was likely due to exudation of carbohydrates by sugarcane and solubilization of soil OM.
Sugarcane plants were under varying degrees of high water stress at our water tables. A previous report showed that nine cultivars had average yield reductions of 8% when grown in an organic soil with a 15-cm compared with a 38-cm water table level, and one of those cultivars had a yield reduction of 25% (Glaz et al., 2002). Therefore, flooding induces stress in nontolerant plants, causing them to exude increased levels of carbohydrates in the rhizosphere compared with nonstressed plants (Drew, 1997). Amounts of exudation can be large because under nonstressed conditions, some plant roots excrete as much as 25% of their dry matter in the rhizosphere (Barber and Martin, 1976; Haller and Stolp, 1985).
It has also been reported that flooding fallow organic soils may also increase SOC. Reddy (1982) collected five organic soils in 7.5-cm plastic cylinders and incubated them in a greenhouse without plants for 5 wk. When he flooded the soils, SOC increases ranged from 18 to 144 mg C kg1 soil wk1. The exact contribution of SOC from plants and soils could not be determined in our study. But, regardless of the source, SOC would need to be included in the calibration with BO across a wide range of soil types and water table levels to use SOC to indicate OM oxidation potential. Even though there are detectable quantities of SOC that increase with flooding, research on Histosols in California has shown that soil loss due to dissolution of C from soil OM is small (<1%) compared with larger gaseous C losses (60 to 76%) due to microbial oxidation of OM (Deverel and Rojstaczer, 1996).
Another parameter that appears to have potential to monitor soil OM oxidation is SM (Fig. 2B). There was a significant negative correlation between SM and BO (Table 2). The most probable reason for this negative correlation is because there is generally less O2 in the soil with increasing moisture content (Reddy, 1987). Thus, lower O2 levels reduced microbial activity that was responsible for OM oxidation. As with SOC, SM would need to be calibrated against BO across a range of soils and water table levels in the field, as Histosols have different types and quantities of OM that affects water holding capacity and capillary rise, which in turn influences soil O2 contents.
The T7 could not be used as an indicator for OM oxidation potential in our study because neither BO nor RESP were correlated with T7 (Table 2). One contributing reason is probably related to the relatively narrow temperature range encountered (Fig. 2C). In addition, Reddy (1982) incubated EAA soils in a greenhouse for 1 yr and reported little effect due to seasonal temperatures (between 5 and 35°C) on N mineralization (Reddy, 1982).
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Microbial biomass C method was not a good indicator of oxidation potential because even though MBC tended to increase at higher water table levels, there was no relationship with BO, suggesting that microorganisms responsible for soil oxidation are only a portion of the total microbial population in the soil. Similarly, the RESP method reflects respiration from both microorganisms and plant roots and appears not to be valid for monitoring soil OM oxidation potential in sugarcane fields. Neither MBC nor RESP were related to SOC, which suggests that not all of the SOC was available for microbial utilization.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Received for publication November 13, 2002.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||